2018
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2017.2755689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive Improvement of Temperature-Dependent Jiles–Atherton Model Utilizing Variable Model Parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, with the increasing development of artificial intelligence, some scholars also use machine learning methods to figure out the losses of soft magnetic materials [17]. The J-A model has high computational efficiency, accurate parameter description, clear physical concepts, and it can be also extended to dynamic hysteresis models for low, medium and high frequency bands [18,19]. The J-A model is currently being used in a significant capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, with the increasing development of artificial intelligence, some scholars also use machine learning methods to figure out the losses of soft magnetic materials [17]. The J-A model has high computational efficiency, accurate parameter description, clear physical concepts, and it can be also extended to dynamic hysteresis models for low, medium and high frequency bands [18,19]. The J-A model is currently being used in a significant capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al introduced temperature parameters into the static J-A model. At high temperatures and DC, the hysteresis characteristics of electrical steel plate can be emulated by the static J-A model that has temperature parameters [19]. Zhang et al simulated hysteresis curves of ferrite from 20 • C to 160 • C by the dynamic J-A model and analyzed variability of magnetic properties of ferrite with temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to different modeling principles, hysteresis models are divided into physics‐based models and data‐driven models. The physics‐based models are constructed by considering the basic physical property of hysteresis, 18 which include such classical models as Duhem model, 19 Jiles–Atherton model, 20 Maxwell model, 21 and so forth. Instead, the data‐driven models describe hysteresis based on the measured data of PEAs without considering the physical mechanism, 22 some typical data‐driven hysteresis models include Bouc–Wen model, 23 Preisach model, 24 Prandtl–Ishlinskii model, 25,26 Krasnoselskii–Pokrovskii model, 27 fuzzy model, 28 neural‐network‐based model 29‐31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hysteresis behavior is an nonlinearity property which has been researched for many years. Many models have been utilized so as to capture the characteristic of hysteresis, like Jiles-Atherton model [7], [8], Preisach model [9], [10], Prandtl-Ishlinskii model [11], [12], Maxwell slip model [13], [14] and BW model [15], [16] are divided to physical models and mathematical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%