Comprehensive Meta-analysis of Ontology Annotated 16S rRNA Profiles Identifies Beta Diversity Clusters of Environmental Bacterial Communities

Abstract

Comprehensive mapping of environmental microbiomes in terms of their compositional features remains a great challenge in understanding the microbial biosphere of the Earth. It bears promise to identify the driving forces behind the observed community patterns and whether community assembly happens deterministically. Advances in Next Generation Sequencing allow large community profiling studies, exceeding sequencing data output of conventional methods in scale by orders of magnitude. However, appropriate collection systems are still in a nascent state. We here present a database of 20,427 diverse environmental 16S rRNA profiles from 2,426 independent studies, which forms the foundation of our meta-analysis. We conducted a sample size adaptive all-against-all beta diversity comparison while also respecting phylogenetic relationships of Operational Taxonomic Units(OTUs). After conventional hierarchical clustering we systematically test for enrichment of Environmental Ontology terms and their abstractions in all possible clusters. This post-hoc algorithm provides a novel formalism that quantifies to what extend compositional and semantic similarity of microbial community samples coincide. We automatically visualize significantly enriched subclusters on a comprehensive dendrogram of microbial communities. As a result we obtain the hitherto most differentiated and comprehensive view on global patterns of microbial community diversity. We observe strong clusterability of microbial communities in ecosystems such as human/mammal-associated, geothermal, fresh water, plant-associated, soils and rhizosphere microbiomes, whereas hypersaline and anthropogenic samples are less homogeneous. Moreover, saline samples appear less cohesive in terms of compositional properties than previously reported.

Inhibition of anaerobic digestion processes: Applications of molecular tools

“…OTUs were assigned using QIIME implementation of the UCLUST_ref (Edgar, 2010) algorithm for clustering, with a threshold of 97% similarity. Betadiversity was calculated after adaptive rarefaction (Henschel et al, 2015) using a Bray Curtis matrix and hierarchical clustering. Samples were pooled based on categorical levels of LCFA and VFA.…”

Meta-Analysis of Vaginal Microbiome Data Provides New Insights Into Preterm Birth

“…Meta-analysis has been carried out extensively in the fields of gene expression (Waldron and Riester, 2016) and genome-wide association studies (Evangelou and Ioannidis, 2013), where the robustness of the signatures across different studies is well established (Chen et al, 2014;Hughey and Butte, 2015). Meta-analysis across microbiome studies is much less common due to heterogeneity of the data and lack of analytical standards, though a few recent publications show that meta-analysis is possible and advantageous for microbiome data (Koren et al, 2013;Henschel et al, 2015;Duvallet et al, 2017;Mancabelli et al, 2017). In a recent paper by Duvallet et al (2017), the authors demonstrate the importance of performing meta-analysis for gut microbiome in health and disease across a large number of studies and samples.…”

Visibiome: an efficient microbiome search engine based on a scalable, distributed architecture

“…Visibiome is connected to two main databases: (i) the Visibiome database ( D V ) and (ii) the indexed microbiome database ( D M ). D V contains user schema and user query metadata while D M houses an annotated database assembled from various other microbiome databases (described in [18]), comprising additional information for samples (such as sample size, Environmental Ontology (EnvO) annotation) and GreenGenes OTUs (taxonomic lineage, 16S rRNA copy number). Visibiome mainly performs complex, multiple read queries on both databases and few, simple write queries on D V .…”