2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-017-1370-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive molecular biomarker identification in breast cancer brain metastases

Abstract: BackgroundBreast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) develop in about 20–30% of breast cancer (BC) patients. BCBM are associated with dismal prognosis not at least due to lack of valuable molecular therapeutic targets. The aim of the study was to identify new molecular biomarkers and targets in BCBM by using complementary state-of-the-art techniques.MethodsWe compared array expression profiles of three BCBM with 16 non-brain metastatic BC and 16 primary brain tumors (prBT) using a false discovery rate (FDR) p < 0.0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
382
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(382 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
382
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), and one from Weigelt and colleagues (40), which could not find any global significant differences over chance expected between primary and metastasic breast cancer samples. Studies subsequent to the Weigelt and colleagues' study have been able to define widespread differences associated with breast cancer metastasis versus primary tumors (5,8,9). Interestingly, when surveying TCGA data, none of the Ramaswamy signature genes showed consistent high or low expression patterns in metastasis across the different cancer types (Supplementary Data S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), and one from Weigelt and colleagues (40), which could not find any global significant differences over chance expected between primary and metastasic breast cancer samples. Studies subsequent to the Weigelt and colleagues' study have been able to define widespread differences associated with breast cancer metastasis versus primary tumors (5,8,9). Interestingly, when surveying TCGA data, none of the Ramaswamy signature genes showed consistent high or low expression patterns in metastasis across the different cancer types (Supplementary Data S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular comparisons between primary tumors and metastases can potentially provide insights into the pathways and processes involved with cancer disease progression (4,5). Numerous independent studies have carried out gene expression profiling of metastasis versus primary cancer for individual cancer types (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). In addition to individual studies by cancer type, "pancancer" molecular analyses would allow for examining similarities and differences among the molecular alterations that may be associated with metastasis across diverse cancer types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a transcription target of MYC, BAG1 cooperates with HSP70 molecular chaperone to selectively mediate MYC overexpression and affect the survival of OS cells [55]. The abnormal expression of BNIP3 is associated with the prognosis of renal cancer [56], breast cancer [57], and salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma [16]. Abnormal expression of AMBRA1 is associated with prognosis of bile duct cancer and cutaneous melanoma [58,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNORA47 is involved in lung cancer tumorigenesis [26] and promotes tumorigenesis by regulating EMT markers in hepatocellular carcinoma [27]. SNORA71C is overexpressed in breast cancer brain metastases [28]. Furthermore, SNHG3 facilitates cell proliferation and migration in oral squamous cell carcinoma via targeting nuclear transcription factor Y subunit gamma [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%