Comprehensive Neonatal Cardiac, Feed and Wrap, Non‐contrast, Non‐sedated, Free‐breathing Compressed Sensing 4D Flow MRI Assessment

Abstract

Background Cardiac MRI is an important imaging tool in congenital cardiac disease, but its use has been limited in the neonatal population as general anesthesia has been needed for breath‐holding. Technological advances in four‐dimensional (4D) flow MRI have now made nonsedated free‐breathing acquisition protocols a viable clinical option, but the method requires prospective validation in neonates. Purpose To test the feasibility of compressed sensing (CS) 4D flow MRI in the neonatal population and to compare with standard previously validated two‐dimensional (2D) phase‐contrast (PC) flow MRI. Study type Prospective, cohort, image quality. Population A total of 14 healthy neonates (median [range] age: 2.5 [0–80] days; 8 male). Field Strength and Sequence Noncontrast 2D cine gradient echo sequence with through‐plane velocity encoding (PC) sequence and compressed sensing (CS) three‐dimensional (3D), time‐resolved, cine phase‐contrast MRI with 3D velocity‐encoding (4D flow MRI) at 3 T. Assessment Aortic 2D PC, and aortic, pulmonary trunk and superior vena cava CS 4D flow MRI were acquired using the feed and wrap technique (nonsedated) and quantified using commercially available software. Aortic flow and peak velocity were compared between methods. Internal consistency of 4D flow MRI was determined by comparing mean forward flow of the main pulmonary artery (MPA) vs. the sum of left and right pulmonary artery flows (LPA and RPA) and by comparing mean ascending aorta forward flow (AAo) vs. the sum of superior vena cava (SVC) and descending aorta flows (DAo). Statistical Tests Flow and peak‐velocity comparisons were assessed using paired t‐tests, with P < 0.05 considered significant, and Bland–Altman analysis. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement and internal consistency were analyzed by intraclass correlation co‐efficient (ICC). Results There was no statistically significant difference between ascending aortic forward flow between 2D PC and CS 4D Flow MRI (P = 0.26) with a bias of 0.11 mL (−0.59 to 0.82 mL) nor peak velocity (P = 0.11), with a bias of −5 cm/sec and (−26 to 16 cm/sec). There was excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement for each vessel (interobserver ICC: AAo 1.00; DAo 0.94, SVC 0.90, MPA 0.99, RPA 0.98, LPA 0.96; intraobserver ICC: AAo 1.00; DAo 0.99, SVC 0.98, MPA 1.00, RPA 1.00, LPA 0.99). Internal consistency measures showed excellent agreement for both mean forward flow of main pulmonary artery vs. the sum of left and right pulmonary arteries (ICC: 0.95) and mean ascending aorta forward flow vs. the sum of superior vena cava and descending aorta flows (ICC: 1.00). Conclusion Sedation‐free neonatal feed and wrap MRI is well tolerated and feasible. CS 4D flow MRI quantification is similar to validated 2D PC free‐breathing imaging with excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreement. Evidence Level 1 Technical Efficacy Stage 2

MRI pulmonary artery flow detects lung vascular pathology in preterms with lung disease

“…Increased RV afterload in the BPD lung develops as a consequence of vascular remodelling that results in abnormal hypoxia-induced vasoconstriction and increased PVR, resembling PH pathology [ 58 , 59 ]. Although no standard values for NFV r/l have been reported for preterm infants at near-term age, our values measured in infants without BPD are within the range of reported reference values in neonates and adults ( supplementary material ) [ 60 – 62 ]. Further, the increase in NFV r/l in BPD likely not only reflects the (pseudo-)increase in NFV due to RV afterload but demonstrates the asymmetry of these (remodelling-induced) effects based on lung volume differences (r>l) at the same time.…”

Non-Invasive Imaging Assessment in Patients with Aortic Coarctation: A Contemporary Review

“…In a study by Panayiotou et al, they demonstrated the successful and well-tolerated application of sedation-free neonatal “feed and wrap” MRI in a group of 14 neonatal patients. The results showed that 4D flow MRI quantification closely matched the validated 2D phase contrast (PC) free-breathing imaging method, exhibiting excellent agreement among different observers and for repeated measurements [ 32 , 33 ]. This innovation potentially facilitates the evaluation of congenital heart conditions before surgery with MRI in younger patients [ 33 ].…”

Complete Transposition of the Great Arteries in the Pediatric Field: A Multimodality Imaging Approach

“…However, the advent of four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI technology offers a promising shift toward nonsedated, free-breathing acquisition protocols. Innovations like the “feed and wrap” technique [ 64 ], demonstrate the feasibility of sedation-free neonatal MRI, providing flow and volume quantifications that align closely with traditional 2D phase contrast methods. This development increases the introduction of MRI in neonates and pediatric patients at any stage of clinical treatment [ 34 , 65 ].…”