2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive quantification of global cropland ammonia emissions and potential abatement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future tool development and linkages could consider other emissions sources -such as aviation, open burning, or wildfires -to explore the futures of additional activities that may be underestimated (Pan et al, 2020) or not fully covered by the default inventories used here. Integration with other modeling tools could examine key inter-pollutant or pollutantclimate feedbacks, such as the increased NH 3 emissions rates in a warming world (Yang et al, 2021). External coupling to other ensemble results could address important but out-ofscope elements such as meteorological uncertainty, given its importance in past studies that compared natural variability with other sources of uncertainty in health impacts analysis of air pollution (Pienkosz et al, 2019;Saari et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future tool development and linkages could consider other emissions sources -such as aviation, open burning, or wildfires -to explore the futures of additional activities that may be underestimated (Pan et al, 2020) or not fully covered by the default inventories used here. Integration with other modeling tools could examine key inter-pollutant or pollutantclimate feedbacks, such as the increased NH 3 emissions rates in a warming world (Yang et al, 2021). External coupling to other ensemble results could address important but out-ofscope elements such as meteorological uncertainty, given its importance in past studies that compared natural variability with other sources of uncertainty in health impacts analysis of air pollution (Pienkosz et al, 2019;Saari et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For calculation of atmospheric NH 3 , studies mainly focus on the NH 3 subsystem, since the processbased modes consider all significant N outputs, including gas emissions (N 2 O, NO, NH 3 ), dissolved soil N and crop uptake in response all relevant cropland N inputs (organic manure, N deposition, nitrogen fixation, crop residues and synthetic N fertilizer). The resulting total NH 3 emissions are then calculated as the product of NH 3 concentration in the soil liquid phase and the parameterized emission coefficients (Yang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Bottom-up Process-based Model Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gaseous emissions from agricultural land play a crucial role in carbon and nitrogen cycling, which is essential for maintaining ecosystem balance. Cropland NH 3 volatilization is the dominant global source of atmospheric NH 3 , and its emissions can negatively impact air quality and cause soil pollution. However, a large uncertainty exists regarding its contribution to spatiotemporal NH x deposition patterns, which are difficult to estimate using source emission inventory and satellite observations. , Still, these two methods typically rely on static emission coefficients and have longer data updates and lower regional resolution, which does not reflect the real-time dynamic behavior of NH 3 emissions and NH x deposition at the point scales. In comparison, the nitrogen stable isotope composition (δ 15 N) in environmental samples may effectively retain information about relevant emission sources and target pollutant formation processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%