2021
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i41.7173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive radiomics nomogram for predicting survival of patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

Abstract: BACKGROUND Combined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is defined as a single nodule showing differentiation into HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and has a poor prognosis. AIM To develop a radiomics nomogram for predicting post-resection survival of patients with cHCC-CCA. METHODS Patients with pathologically diagnosed cHCC-CCA were randomly divided into training and validation sets. Radiomics features we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have indicated that radiomic features are closely linked to patients' prognosis and underlying genomic phenotyping across a wide range of cancer types. 11,12 A few studies have reported that radiomics analysis on the basis of contrast enhanced CT has a convincing predictive power in predicting primary pancreatic tumor and lymph nodes pathological status. 13,14 However, these radiomics signatures were built with few radiomics features or without external validation, making their use in clinical practice very limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have indicated that radiomic features are closely linked to patients' prognosis and underlying genomic phenotyping across a wide range of cancer types. 11,12 A few studies have reported that radiomics analysis on the basis of contrast enhanced CT has a convincing predictive power in predicting primary pancreatic tumor and lymph nodes pathological status. 13,14 However, these radiomics signatures were built with few radiomics features or without external validation, making their use in clinical practice very limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiomics has recently emerged, a technique that can potentially transform original monochrome images into quantitative features using high‐throughput extraction methods. Previous studies have indicated that radiomic features are closely linked to patients' prognosis and underlying genomic phenotyping across a wide range of cancer types 11,12 . A few studies have reported that radiomics analysis on the basis of contrast enhanced CT has a convincing predictive power in predicting primary pancreatic tumor and lymph nodes pathological status 13,14 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there has been significant progress in the application of radiomics in cancer research, which has led to improved non-invasive characterization of lesions 27 . A number of studies have focused on utilizing radiomics to analyze liver tissue and tumors in imaging studies 28 , 29 . Specifically, researchers have extensively explored the potential of radiomics features in discriminating between HCC and benign liver lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the accuracy of manual segmentation depends on the reader's experience. Furthermore, most ROIs are defined by at least two experienced radiologists and the results are compared, which is time‐consuming and may lead to inter‐observer reliability issues 23,24 . Segmentation is the most critical, challenging, and contentious component of radiomics 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, most ROIs are defined by at least two experienced radiologists and the results are compared, which is time-consuming and may lead to inter-observer reliability issues. 23,24 Segmentation is the most critical, challenging, and contentious component of radiomics. 9 In our study, we used an automated segmentation method to define ROIs, which has shown greater reproducibility in feature extraction than manual segmentation.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%