2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive strategies of machine-learning-based quantitative structure-activity relationship models

Abstract: Summary Early quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) technologies have unsatisfactory versatility and accuracy in fields such as drug discovery because they are based on traditional machine learning and interpretive expert features. The development of Big Data and deep learning technologies significantly improve the processing of unstructured data and unleash the great potential of QSAR. Here we discuss the integration of wet experiments (which provide experimental data and reliable ver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 242 publications
(221 reference statements)
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models can reduce the time and cost of molecular screening through mathematical prediction models of regression or classification of properties and activities of a chemical compound based on their chemical structure and statistically significant corresponding physicochemical/toxicological properties with other methods such as homology modeling, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation . The structure-based molecular design mainly includes a receptor-based method through a three-dimensional (3D) chemical structure to obtain ligand interaction [1,35,36]. However, traditional QSAR models may frequently miss suitable candidate molecules, because of the poor predictive accuracy and versatility caused by poor feature selection that requires skill and knowledge and conformational limitations for coincidence effect [1,[37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models can reduce the time and cost of molecular screening through mathematical prediction models of regression or classification of properties and activities of a chemical compound based on their chemical structure and statistically significant corresponding physicochemical/toxicological properties with other methods such as homology modeling, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation . The structure-based molecular design mainly includes a receptor-based method through a three-dimensional (3D) chemical structure to obtain ligand interaction [1,35,36]. However, traditional QSAR models may frequently miss suitable candidate molecules, because of the poor predictive accuracy and versatility caused by poor feature selection that requires skill and knowledge and conformational limitations for coincidence effect [1,[37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure-based molecular design mainly includes a receptor-based method through a three-dimensional (3D) chemical structure to obtain ligand interaction [1,35,36]. However, traditional QSAR models may frequently miss suitable candidate molecules, because of the poor predictive accuracy and versatility caused by poor feature selection that requires skill and knowledge and conformational limitations for coincidence effect [1,[37][38][39]. Therefore, a QSAR system with high-throughput and performance is desired because of the development of novel medicines, chemicals, and nanomaterials on human health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The in silico methods, especially the ligand-based QSAR (quantitative structure–activity relationships) approaches and structural base docking methods, are widely used in the computer-aided drug design field ( Mao et al, 2021 ; Sabe et al, 2021 ). These methods are applied to predict the compound’s activities against endocrine-related proteins, such as the estrogen receptor (ER) and androgen receptor (AR) ( Schneider et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decision tree establishes rules for decision making, that is, the algorithm will generate a structure like a flowchart with "nodes" where a condition will be checked and if met, the flow follows one branch, otherwise, it follows another, always leading to the nearest "node" where further decisionmaking will take place, until the end of the tree. Thus, given a training set, the algorithm will analyze the data and look for the best conditions and where to insert each data into the flow [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%