2014
DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.571v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive, structurally-curated alignment and phylogeny of vertebrate biogenic amine receptors

Abstract: Biogenic amine receptors play critical roles in regulating behavior and physiology, particularly within the central nervous system, in both vertebrates and invertebrates. These receptors belong to the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family and interact with endogenous bioamine ligands, such as dopamine, serotonin, and epinephrine, and they are targeted by a wide array of pharmaceuticals. Despite these receptors’ clear clinical and biological importance, their evolutionary history remains poorly characterized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with previous results, the clade that includes dopamine receptors (DRD) 2, 3 and 4 was recovered as sister to the ADRA2 clade (Spielman et al, 2015;Zavala et al, 2017). Although we expected dopamine receptors (DRD) 1 and 5 to be sister to the βadrenoreceptors (ADRB) (Spielman et al, 2015;Zavala et al, 2017), this was not the case. This could mainly be due to the fact that the sampling effort performed in this study was not aimed at resolving the evolutionary relationship among these genes.…”
Section: Gene Trees Synteny Analyses and Orthologysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In agreement with previous results, the clade that includes dopamine receptors (DRD) 2, 3 and 4 was recovered as sister to the ADRA2 clade (Spielman et al, 2015;Zavala et al, 2017). Although we expected dopamine receptors (DRD) 1 and 5 to be sister to the βadrenoreceptors (ADRB) (Spielman et al, 2015;Zavala et al, 2017), this was not the case. This could mainly be due to the fact that the sampling effort performed in this study was not aimed at resolving the evolutionary relationship among these genes.…”
Section: Gene Trees Synteny Analyses and Orthologysupporting
confidence: 89%