2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2022.106872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive thermodynamic study of alkyl-biphenyls as a promising liquid organic hydrogen carriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we have shown that even from such rough data, reasonable trends can generally be derived. [33] Indeed, the enthalpy of vaporization enthalpy, D g l H o m (298.15 K) = 89.4 � 4.7 kJ • mol À 1 , derived from the BPs collected for RS-(�)-ibuprofen in Table S7 is more consistent with our transpiration result than that of CGC. Therefore, the sublimation enthalpies determined by Maxwell and Chickos [12] from the combination of CGC-derived enthalpies of vaporization and the fusion enthalpies of (RS)-and (S)-ibuprofen adjusted to T = 298.15 K should also be regarded as overestimated (see Table 2).…”
Section: Experimental Standard Molar Enthalpies Of Vaporization From ...supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Nevertheless, we have shown that even from such rough data, reasonable trends can generally be derived. [33] Indeed, the enthalpy of vaporization enthalpy, D g l H o m (298.15 K) = 89.4 � 4.7 kJ • mol À 1 , derived from the BPs collected for RS-(�)-ibuprofen in Table S7 is more consistent with our transpiration result than that of CGC. Therefore, the sublimation enthalpies determined by Maxwell and Chickos [12] from the combination of CGC-derived enthalpies of vaporization and the fusion enthalpies of (RS)-and (S)-ibuprofen adjusted to T = 298.15 K should also be regarded as overestimated (see Table 2).…”
Section: Experimental Standard Molar Enthalpies Of Vaporization From ...supporting
confidence: 83%
“…This is easy to explain, as the differences ( T av – 298.15) in eq are no more than 10–30 K. In contrast, for the methods that work at elevated temperatures (e.g., static method) or close to the boiling point (e.g., ebulliometry), the differences ( T av – 298.15) can be 100–200 K. Therefore, for the latter methods, the reliability of the Δ C p ,m ° values is crucial to reconcile the results of the “low-temperature” methods (e.g., transpiration) and the “high-temperature” methods such as ebulliometry or FSC. In our recent studies, we have found that the empirical eq significantly overestimates the Δ C p ,m ° values, e.g., for the long-chained methyl alkanoates or for the long-chained alkyl biphenyls . The series of alkyl benzoates investigated in this work is structurally related to the methyl alkanoates, so it makes sense to check the validity of eq for alkyl benzoates because irregularities are to be expected for this homologous series as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In our recent studies, we have found that the empirical eq 9 significantly overestimates the ΔC p,m °values, e.g., for the long-chained methyl alkanoates 51 or for the long-chained alkyl biphenyls. 52 The series of alkyl benzoates investigated in this work is structurally related to the methyl alkanoates, so it makes sense to check the validity of eq 9 for alkyl benzoates because irregularities are to be expected for this homologous series as well.…”
Section: Experimental Standard Molar Enthalpies Of Vaporization Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a rule, the pressures are determined using non-calibrated manometers and the boiling temperatures are usually monitored in the range of a few degrees. Recently [12], however, we have shown that even from such rough data, reasonable trends can generally be derived and used for comparison if no systematic vapour pressures are available. The boiling temperatures compiled for methoxy-biphenyls in Table S3 were measured at the elevated temperature and cannot be directly compared to the "low temperature" transpiration results.…”
Section: Step I: Experimental Absolute Vapour Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 99%