2014
DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2014.03.0084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive versus consultative rehabilitation services postacute stroke: Outcomes differ

Abstract: Abstract-Comprehensive rehabilitation services after acute stroke have been shown efficacious in European trials; however, their effectiveness in everyday practices in the United States is unknown. We compared outcomes of veteran patients provided with comprehensive rehabilitation with those provided with consultative rehabilitation services after acute stroke using propensity scores. Outcomes included change in patients' physical and cognitive independence after rehabilitation, discharge to home as opposed to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11,12] There is also some indication in the literature that patients admitted to IRF experience better functional recovery than those admitted to SNF. [1317] To date, studies comparing IRF to SNF outcomes in the United States have all been observational in nature, and no randomized studies have been performed. As a result, comparing IRF to SNF stroke rehabilitation outcomes is complicated by the differences between the patient populations referred for these 2 different types of care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11,12] There is also some indication in the literature that patients admitted to IRF experience better functional recovery than those admitted to SNF. [1317] To date, studies comparing IRF to SNF outcomes in the United States have all been observational in nature, and no randomized studies have been performed. As a result, comparing IRF to SNF stroke rehabilitation outcomes is complicated by the differences between the patient populations referred for these 2 different types of care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is said that the appropriate time for discharge from a convalescent hospital is when the patient becomes independent in activities of daily living (ADL) or when there is no improvement in function despite training [ 4 , 5 ]. Although individual rehabilitation by physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech therapists, and other professionals is essential to promoting independence, comprehensive management through multidisciplinary cooperation plays a key role in improving the level of independence in hospitals of convalescence [ 6 ]. Oral health management by dentists may also contribute to such multidisciplinary collaboration to improve ADL in the convalescent period through oral care and recovery of eating patterns and occlusal support [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Therefore, after the acute phase of brain treatment and prevention of recurrence, it is important to enhance ADLs through rehabilitation to avoid patients becoming bedridden and to enable a return to life similar to that before the onset of stroke. 4) An important goal of stroke treatment is the patient's return home from the hospital.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, approximately 40% of stroke patients are not able to return home from the convalescent rehabilitation ward. 5) Previous studies reported that some factors preventing patients from returning home were female sex, 9) advanced age, 10,11) stroke severity, 12) poor nutrition, 13) sarcopenia, 14,15) low ADL level before the incidence of stroke, 9) cognitive function, 4,16) and ADL. 11,17) Although ADL is a strong predictor for returning home, patients can return home if appropriate care is available and adjustments have been made to the living environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%