2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2011.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressed liquid density measurements for {methylbenzoate+(cyclohexane or 1-hexanol)} binary systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that testing the binary mixture highlighted an inconsistency of two original experimental data sets reported by different sources that give the principal deviations from the model. In that case, deviations of up to 2 kg·m −3 are observed, and there is an inconsistency between the low-pressure liquid density experimental data sets 35,36 relative to the Redlich−Kister equation as shown in Figure 4c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that testing the binary mixture highlighted an inconsistency of two original experimental data sets reported by different sources that give the principal deviations from the model. In that case, deviations of up to 2 kg·m −3 are observed, and there is an inconsistency between the low-pressure liquid density experimental data sets 35,36 relative to the Redlich−Kister equation as shown in Figure 4c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(a) Model-based validation test performance for the binary mixture (cyclohexane + methyl benzoate), reference state: density of saturated liquid; Q = 0.28; T 1 * = 500.7; V 1 * = 111.2; C 1 * = −33.70; T 2 * = 589.6; V 2 * = 142.4; C 2 * = −31.35; the mixing term is equal to zero. The sources of experimental data are Rathnam et al and Davila et al (b) Deviation of the model from experimental data; , (c) deviation of the low-pressure liquid density experimental data of Rathnam et al . (in red) and Davila et al; (in black) from the Redlich–Kister equation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation