2010
DOI: 10.1049/el.2010.2325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressed sensing joint reconstruction for multi-view images

Abstract: The problem of compressed sensing joint reconstruction of multi-view images in camera networks is considered. Noting that the neighbouring images are visually similar, the multi-view correlation is captured by the sparse prior of the difference images between two contiguous multi-view images. Thus the joint reconstruction is formulated as an unconstrained optimisation problem, which contains a quadratic fidelity term and two regularisation terms encouraging the sparse priors for multi-view images and their dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, disparity between neighbouring views captured by different cameras can be established and utilised for sparse representation. Li et al [8] assume that the gradient modulus of multi‐view images and the wavelet coefficients of the difference image are also sparse, so these prior properties could be used to build optimisation model for joint reconstruction of multi‐view images. Liu et al [9] utilise intra‐frame, inter‐view, and temporal correlations to enhance signal sparsity, and propose a novel joint reconstruction algorithm for multi‐view video reconstruction from independently CS frames and views.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, disparity between neighbouring views captured by different cameras can be established and utilised for sparse representation. Li et al [8] assume that the gradient modulus of multi‐view images and the wavelet coefficients of the difference image are also sparse, so these prior properties could be used to build optimisation model for joint reconstruction of multi‐view images. Liu et al [9] utilise intra‐frame, inter‐view, and temporal correlations to enhance signal sparsity, and propose a novel joint reconstruction algorithm for multi‐view video reconstruction from independently CS frames and views.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the image decomposition model in Section 3.1, the foreground image is actually the difference image between the multi‐view image and its background. In liberate [8, 20], researchers have discussed the sparsity of this difference image, and considered that it is sparse in a certain dictionary or a set of bases, such as Haar wavelets. Here, we also use the Haar wavelet transformation, and then this sparsity can be measured by the L1 norm of Haar coefficients, argminxifiWxif1…”
Section: Multi‐view Image Sequences Spatial Correlation and Sparsitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the reconstructed scene is used to refine the camera parameters and thus both the camera positions and the scene are jointly estimated using alternating minimization techniques. In another framework [22], the authors have proposed a joint reconstruction scheme based on a regularized optimization framework. The two regularization terms encourage sparse priors of multi-view images and their difference images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reference [4], the correlation between images is represented by local geometric transformations, and the joint reconstruction is formulated as a l 2 -l 1 optimization problem. Thirumalai and Frossard estimate the correlation of images directly from the linear measurements by using Graph Cuts algorithm to solve a regularized energy minimization problem [5] .Li et al propose to treat the joint reconstruction as an unconstrained optimization problem, which is solved by an effective iterative method [6] . Dai et al formulate the occurrences of outliers as a sparse model and solve it by a proximal-gradient algorithm [7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%