2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2006.01.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressibility of a two-dimensional extended Hubbard model

Abstract: The compressibility of an extended d − p Hubbard model is investigated by the Roth's two-pole approximation. Using the factorization procedure proposed by Beenen and Edwards, superconductivity with singlet d x 2 −y 2 -wave pairing is also considered. Within this framework, the effects of d − p hybridization and Coulomb interaction U on the compressibility are studied carefully. It has been found that the compressibility diverges and then it becomes negative near the half-filling. Within Roth's method, it has b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known from earlier results [15] that in the normal state the function S j • S i is strongly dependent on the doping and the Coulomb interaction, particularly, on the underdoped regime. Moreover, it has also been verified that the correlation function S + j S − i , which behaves like S j • S i , is also strongly dependent on the d − p hybridization t dp [28]. However, for a given doping δ, U and t pd produce effects in opposite direction, i.e., while U increases the intensity of S j • S i , t dp decreases it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well known from earlier results [15] that in the normal state the function S j • S i is strongly dependent on the doping and the Coulomb interaction, particularly, on the underdoped regime. Moreover, it has also been verified that the correlation function S + j S − i , which behaves like S j • S i , is also strongly dependent on the d − p hybridization t dp [28]. However, for a given doping δ, U and t pd produce effects in opposite direction, i.e., while U increases the intensity of S j • S i , t dp decreases it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In Refs. [13,26,27,28], the band shift has been evaluated following the original Roth's procedure [12], where t d 0j = t d for the z nearest-neighbors has been considered. Consequently, this procedure removes the k-dependence of the correlation functions (mainly S j • S i ) present in the band shift.…”
Section: Model and General Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has also been verified that the correlation function S + j S − i , which behaves like S j · S i , is also strongly dependent on the d − p hybridization t dp [28]. However, for a given doping δ, U and t pd produce effects in opposite direction, i.e., while U increases the intensity of S j · S i , t dp decreases it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…[13,26,27,28], the band shift has been evaluated following the original Roth's procedure [12], where t d 0j = t d for the z nearest-neighbors has been considered. Consequently, this procedure removes the k-dependence of the correlation functions (mainly S j · S i ) present in the band shift.…”
Section: Model and General Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%