2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017jb015129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressible Flow Phenomena at Inception of Lateral Density Currents Fed by Collapsing Gas‐Particle Mixtures

Abstract: Many geological flows are sourced by falling gas‐particle mixtures, such as during collapse of lava domes, and impulsive eruptive jets, and sustained columns, and rock falls. The transition from vertical to lateral flow is complex due to the range of coupling between particles of different sizes and densities and the carrier gas, and due to the potential for compressible flow phenomena. We use multiphase modeling to explore these dynamics. In mixtures with small particles, and with subsonic speeds, particles f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(60 reference statements)
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The piles are a simplified representation of the inception of PDCs at the impact location of a collapsing eruption column; this simplification allows us to use the relatively fast‐running TITAN2D model instead of a computationally more intensive multiphase model of collapsing columns. Recent modeling of the dynamics of impacting gas‐particle flows indicates that coarse particles concentrate immediately upon impact and move outward as concentrated granular flows if the collapsing mixture is relatively coarse‐grained (Sweeney & Valentine, ; Valentine & Sweeney, ). Our model setup (assumptions 2 and 3 above) is crudely consistent with those results, noting though that in reality the presence of a large proportion of fine particles would complicate this picture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The piles are a simplified representation of the inception of PDCs at the impact location of a collapsing eruption column; this simplification allows us to use the relatively fast‐running TITAN2D model instead of a computationally more intensive multiphase model of collapsing columns. Recent modeling of the dynamics of impacting gas‐particle flows indicates that coarse particles concentrate immediately upon impact and move outward as concentrated granular flows if the collapsing mixture is relatively coarse‐grained (Sweeney & Valentine, ; Valentine & Sweeney, ). Our model setup (assumptions 2 and 3 above) is crudely consistent with those results, noting though that in reality the presence of a large proportion of fine particles would complicate this picture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explosive volcanoes are multihazard systems where diverse hazardous processes can occur in succession (for instance, lahars triggered by rainfall after a certain volume of pyroclastic material has been deposited around the volcano; e.g., Pierson & Major, 2014) or simultaneously (for instance, contemporaneous tephra fallout and PDC propagation, Valentine & Giannetti, 1995). These hazard interactions can be very complex and our probabilistic hazard assessment of dense PDCs represents an important step toward quantitative multihazard assessments that explicitly account for them.…”
Section: Implications For Quantitative Volcanic Multihazard Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we are not endorsing gravity-driven, shallow water like flow models such as TITAN2D as "good" models for flow events resulting from column collapse, but our approach is agnostic to physical/computational models. That is, further analysis could be done with a different model specifically describing large mass flows from column collapse events, including multiphase and 3-D effects (e.g., Iverson & George, 2014;Neri et al, 2003;Pitman & Le, 2005;Valentine & Wohletz, 1989;Valentine & Sweeney, 2018).…”
Section: Emulating Hazard Contours and Calculating Hazard Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, there is evidence that mobile pyroclastic flows have no continuous gas supply and that the grain size must have a large control on pore pressure decay, which will affect the mobility of pyroclastic flows (Calder et al, 1999). Generation of high pore pressure in pyroclastic flows has been attributed to upward fluidization by particle degassing (Sparks, 1976) and to hindered settling of a collapsing column (Valentine & Sweeney, 2018) or through rapid sedimentation of mesoscale clusters at the base of PCs (Breard et al, 2017). From the point where no continuous gas source exists, the intergranular pore-fluid pressure in pyroclastic flows wanes over time (Druitt et al, 2007).…”
Section: Defluidization 321 Experimental Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%