2014
DOI: 10.2514/1.a32427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compression After Impact Experiments on Thin Face Sheet Honeycomb Core Sandwich Panels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A mesoscale model is chosen considering that, as claimed e.g. in [31], this kind of model is known for being more accurate and computationally advantageous than structural scale models assuming cracks as hard discontinuities. With this approach, the discretely damaged medium is replaced with a continuous homogeneous medium, which is equivalent from an energy standpoint, and which incorporates into the expression of the strain energy damage indicators, computed as the homogenised result of damage micromodels.…”
Section: Mesoscale Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A mesoscale model is chosen considering that, as claimed e.g. in [31], this kind of model is known for being more accurate and computationally advantageous than structural scale models assuming cracks as hard discontinuities. With this approach, the discretely damaged medium is replaced with a continuous homogeneous medium, which is equivalent from an energy standpoint, and which incorporates into the expression of the strain energy damage indicators, computed as the homogenised result of damage micromodels.…”
Section: Mesoscale Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the 152.4 Â 152.4 mm 2 sandwich plates with honeycomb core analysed by McQuigg [31]. The skins of the sandwich construction are obtained using two plies of style 7781 plain woven E-glass fabric with 40% epoxy resin content, whose strength and modulus in the warp and fill direction are 413.6 MPa and 20.7 GPa, respectively, for compressive loading, and 372.3 MPa and 20.7 GPa, respectively, for tensile loading.…”
Section: Panels With Honeycomb Corementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To overcome this drawback, here the damage mesomodel (MSD) by Ladevèze et al [27]- [28] is chosen, considering that this kind of models has an accuracy comparable to that of the above mentioned models, but an improved efficiency, as claimed by McQuigg [29].…”
Section: Damage Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It considers the effects of the damages on the microscale through a modified expression of the strain energy. This damage model was chosen because, as explained in [29], it provides greatly accurate results with a smaller computational burden than structural scale models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%