2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-021-00707-y
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compression and amplification algorithms in hearing aids impair the selectivity of neural responses to speech

Abstract: In quiet environments, hearing aids improve the perception of low-intensity sounds. However, for high-intensity sounds in background noise, the aids often fail to provide a benefit to the wearer.Here, by using large-scale single-neuron recordings from hearing-impaired gerbils -an established animal model of human hearing -we show that hearing aids restore the sensitivity of neural responses to speech, but not their selectivity. Rather than reflecting a deficit in supra-threshold auditory processing, the low se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies suggest that whilst mild-gain hearing aids might potentially reduce the hearing-in-noise handicap of individuals with normal hearing, these technologies remain suboptimal for most of them. Another possible explanation for the low uptake of such technologies might be related to the effects of compression and amplification algorithms—a neurophysiological study conducted in hearing-impaired gerbils showed that although these algorithms help improve sound perception, they fail to restore the selectivity of neural responses to different speech sounds ( Armstrong et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Intervention Strategies For Hidden Hearing Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies suggest that whilst mild-gain hearing aids might potentially reduce the hearing-in-noise handicap of individuals with normal hearing, these technologies remain suboptimal for most of them. Another possible explanation for the low uptake of such technologies might be related to the effects of compression and amplification algorithms—a neurophysiological study conducted in hearing-impaired gerbils showed that although these algorithms help improve sound perception, they fail to restore the selectivity of neural responses to different speech sounds ( Armstrong et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Intervention Strategies For Hidden Hearing Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency response of these speakers measured at the entrance of the ear canal was flat (  5 dB) between 0.2 and 8 kHz. Two craniotomies were made along with incisions in the dura mater, and a 256-channel multielectrode array was inserted into the central nucleus of the IC in each hemisphere 16 . The arrays were custom-designed to maximize coverage of the portion of the gerbil IC that is sensitive to the frequencies that are present in speech.…”
Section: Preparation For Large-scale Ic Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for high-intensity sounds in background noise, the aids often fail to restore the perception of speech (Armstrong et al. 2022 ). Therefore, only a small fraction (10–20%) of older people with significant impairment use a hearing aid (McCormack and Fortnum 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%