1992
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5173(92)90059-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compression characteristics of granulated materials: VI. Pore size distributions, assessed by mercury penetration, of compacts of two lactose granulations with different fragmentation propensities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the finding by Wikberg and Alderborn that demonstrated wider and bimodal pore size distribution for the tablets compressed from granulation with low porosity compared to the narrower and smaller pore size distribution for tablets compressed from the more porous granulation [7]. Porosity of DPC 963 tablets compressed using similar compression force and manufactured using drug substance lots with different particle sizes.…”
Section: Granulation Porositysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is consistent with the finding by Wikberg and Alderborn that demonstrated wider and bimodal pore size distribution for the tablets compressed from granulation with low porosity compared to the narrower and smaller pore size distribution for tablets compressed from the more porous granulation [7]. Porosity of DPC 963 tablets compressed using similar compression force and manufactured using drug substance lots with different particle sizes.…”
Section: Granulation Porositysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Note that typically lactose is compacted at 2-15 kN. 47 The particle densities (D D ) are calculated using the helium pycnometry technique, then using porosity = (1−D b /D D ), it is possible to calculate the porosity of the powder compacts. Table 1 lists the particle densities, bulk densities, and the porosities calculated using the above equation.…”
Section: Microstructure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliable estimates of the average effective particle density are obtained if there is a sufficiently large size difference between intraparticular pores and interparticular voids. 4 However, the size range of inhalation particles is below the size required for mercury porosimetry and hence, the microparticles used in this study were not suitable for this type of analysis. Furthermore, the method cannot identify the density of individual particles or if the density varies with particle size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%