1998
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.206.1.9423684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compression device to reduce motion artifacts at contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the breast.

Abstract: A prototype compression device for a bilateral breast surface coil was manufactured. It was tested in clinical practice (157 patients), and resultant images were compared with those obtained with simple ventral stuffing of the bottom of the coil (181 patients). Compression resulted in reduction of magnetic resonance (MR) examinations with severe motion artifacts from 20 (11%) of 181 examinations to three (2%) of 157 examinations (P = .001). Use of this compression device allowed the subtraction technique at MR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…40 For a clinical trial of four patients with DbPET/CT, in which no immobilization of the breast was used, one set of PET images was not interpretable due to misregistration between the PET and CT. 15 Segmenting the reconstructed PET volume instead of the CT implicitly reduces this problem; however, mild compression of the breast is another potential solution and we plan on implementing an immobilization scheme comparable to that used in breast MRI. 41 Furthermore, it is expected that the larger transaxial FOV (20 versus 12 cm) and the significantly higher SNR of images from the CT compared with the PET will allow for more accurate segmentation of the breast volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 For a clinical trial of four patients with DbPET/CT, in which no immobilization of the breast was used, one set of PET images was not interpretable due to misregistration between the PET and CT. 15 Segmenting the reconstructed PET volume instead of the CT implicitly reduces this problem; however, mild compression of the breast is another potential solution and we plan on implementing an immobilization scheme comparable to that used in breast MRI. 41 Furthermore, it is expected that the larger transaxial FOV (20 versus 12 cm) and the significantly higher SNR of images from the CT compared with the PET will allow for more accurate segmentation of the breast volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include non‐image‐based techniques such as immobilization, (3) , (4) although it has been our experience that immobilization of cancer patients can be self‐defeating due to increased patient anxiety. One class of image‐based techniques to reduce motion artifacts involves retrospective image registration and is incorporated into a number of public‐domain postprocessing software packages, including SPM, AIR, and AFNI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artifacts may result in loss of conspicuity of the lesion and shadowing and blurring of tumor margins. Despite techniques such as respiratory gating, shallow breathing, and simple ventral stuffing of the bottom of the coil, motion artifact in the CE dynamic subtracted images still exists (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%