Proceedings DCC '98 Data Compression Conference (Cat. No.98TB100225)
DOI: 10.1109/dcc.1998.672274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compression of unicode files

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach yields a 12.2% average improvement in compression effectiveness for LZW over a corpus of UTF-8 files. This result compares favourably with the Unicode-aware LZ77 variant from Fenwick and Brierley that achieved only a 2% improvement [6]. Unfortunately their corpus is not available to us, precluding a direct comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Our approach yields a 12.2% average improvement in compression effectiveness for LZW over a corpus of UTF-8 files. This result compares favourably with the Unicode-aware LZ77 variant from Fenwick and Brierley that achieved only a 2% improvement [6]. Unfortunately their corpus is not available to us, precluding a direct comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This fact necessitates the need of a peculiar compression technique for natural languages. A small corpus of Unicode files has been compressed on several widely available text compressors of the various types by Fenwick and Brierley (1998), confirming that Unicode files have different compression characteristics from those known for 8-bit data. The Malayalam text compression by variable length encoding was explained by Divakaran et al (2013), after an informational analysis of Malayalam Language.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%