2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-011-0096-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressive Behavior of Conductive Graphite Foams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute values of the preliminary tensile strengths were similar to the compressive values as documented in Ref. , but the standard deviations associated with the tensile strengths were two‐to‐three times greater than the compressive results at similar densities.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absolute values of the preliminary tensile strengths were similar to the compressive values as documented in Ref. , but the standard deviations associated with the tensile strengths were two‐to‐three times greater than the compressive results at similar densities.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…for the three foam/substrate combinations examined. The strain is obtained via cross‐head displacement as previous data has indicated that the cross‐head displacement provides comparable results with an advanced full‐field, optical strain measurement technique. Table lists the average strengths of the sandwich specimens.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The overall shapes of the stress strain curves were consistent with those found for other porous carbon foams, i.e. the stress increased rapidly to a crush initiation value after which it flat-lined [22]. The crush point was reached at a stroke distance of about 1 mm (2% strain).…”
Section: Mechanical Compression Testssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Foaming affected the electrical conductivity of the nanocomposites, which is attributed to the cell growth effect the alignment and interconnection of the surrounding GNPs and CB conductive fillers. 39,40 Figure 3 illustrates the relative resistance (R/R 0 ) change of foamed samples (GNPs:CB 5 2:1, 6 wt %) with different AC agent content (12,15, and 18 wt %) during the physical foaming process. Obviously, under the AC agent optimum active temperature (140-150 8C), with the foaming time increase, the relative resistance of the three foamed sample decreases at first and then increases.…”
Section: Electrical Conductivity Transformation Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7][8] Physical foaming process such as supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO 2 ) technology 9 provides a feasible method to establish the porous nanocomposites with higher electrical conductivity, lower electrical percolation, higher dielectric permittivity, and lower dielectric loss. [10][11][12][13] Foamed nanocomposites filled with conductive particles [14][15][16] have been researched to enhance the electrical conductivity and electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding effectiveness [17][18][19] owing to their unique combination of electrical conductivity and mechanical flexibility. Yang et al 20 reported a novel foam structure by using the simple preparation process, and investigated the electrical conductivity, complex permittivity, and EMI shielding properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%