2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2017.8296572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressive image recovery using recurrent generative model

Abstract: Original Image * = Compressive Sensing using Single Pixel Camera (15% measurements) Ours PSNR: 29.68 dB TVAL3 PSNR: 24.70 dB Reconstructed Image D-AMP PSNR: 26.76 dBFigure 1: We propose to use a deep generative model, RIDE [27], as an image prior for compressive signal recovery. Since RIDE models long-range dependency in images using spatial LSTM, we are able to recover the image better than other competing methods. AbstractReconstruction of signals from compressively sensed measurements is an ill-posed proble… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can estimate P (x) and sample from the model [21]- [23], or directly generate new samples from P (x) without explicitly estimating the distribution [19], [24]. Dave et al [25] use a spatial long-short-term memory network to learn the distribution P (x); to solve linear inverse problems, they solve a maximum a posteriori estimationmaximizing P (x) for x such that y = Ax. Nguyen et al [26] use a discriminative network and denoising autoencoders to implicitly learn the joint distribution between the image and its label P (x, y), and they generate new samples by sampling the joint distribution P (x, y), i.e., the network, with an approximated Metropolisadjusted Langevin algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can estimate P (x) and sample from the model [21]- [23], or directly generate new samples from P (x) without explicitly estimating the distribution [19], [24]. Dave et al [25] use a spatial long-short-term memory network to learn the distribution P (x); to solve linear inverse problems, they solve a maximum a posteriori estimationmaximizing P (x) for x such that y = Ax. Nguyen et al [26] use a discriminative network and denoising autoencoders to implicitly learn the joint distribution between the image and its label P (x, y), and they generate new samples by sampling the joint distribution P (x, y), i.e., the network, with an approximated Metropolisadjusted Langevin algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SLM may function on a transmission or reflection principle. To enhance the effectiveness (shorten the time) studies are underway on adaptive algorithms that generate pixel masks, which may considerably minimise the number of required measurements [16][17][18]. A solution that still remains universal is the initial concept of applying mask sets, which meet the property of RIP (Restricted Isometry Property).…”
Section: Single Pixel Camera With Compressed Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A class of deep learning based solution involves learning of regularizers or proximal mapping stage and then iteratively solving a MAP problem. Methods like [21], [22], [23] fall under this category. Another class of algorithm is designed as a feed-forward deep neural network that has either been trained in a supervised or self-supervised manner.…”
Section: Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%