2013
DOI: 10.7566/jpsj.82.074702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compton Profile Study and Electron Momentum Density Reconstruction in Hexagonal Mg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compton (Cooper, 1985;Cooper et al, 2004), neutron scattering (Reiter, Mayers & Noreland, 2002;Reiter, Mayers & Platzman, 2002) or ACAR (West, 1995;Hautojä rvi, 1979;Haynes et al, 2012;Dugdale, 2014)], that allow for reconstructing (p) with the highest efficiency. Here, an exception is the maximum entropy reconstruction method (Dobrzyń ski & Holas, 1996;Fornalski et al, 2010;Brancewicz et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compton (Cooper, 1985;Cooper et al, 2004), neutron scattering (Reiter, Mayers & Noreland, 2002;Reiter, Mayers & Platzman, 2002) or ACAR (West, 1995;Hautojä rvi, 1979;Haynes et al, 2012;Dugdale, 2014)], that allow for reconstructing (p) with the highest efficiency. Here, an exception is the maximum entropy reconstruction method (Dobrzyń ski & Holas, 1996;Fornalski et al, 2010;Brancewicz et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to get the CPs, the measured spectra were corrected for background scattering, absorption of photons in the sample, detector efficiencies, scattering cross section and multiple-scattering contribution (MSC) (Brancewicz et al, 2013). The spectrum of multiple-scattered X-rays was simulated by the Monte Carlo method with the use of the MUSCAT program (Brancewicz et al, 2016), which takes into account the exact experimental geometry [up to triple scattering in the sample ( The first Brillouin zone for the hcp structure, marked with high-symmetry points (blue dots) that define the five directions in reciprocal space chosen for the CP measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subtraction of two directional CPs, measured at two specific crystallographic directions, removes all isotropic components from the CPs (i.e. core electrons and background contributions) and forms the so-called difference profiles (anisotropies), which reveal the anisotropy of the electron momentum density distribution associated with the crystal symmetry and the shape of the Fermi surface (fermiology) of the studied material (Sakurai et al, 1995;Hä mä lä inen et al, 1996;Dugdale et al, 2000;Reniewicz et al, 2001;Mizusaki et al, 2003;Bellin et al, 2004;Dugdale et al, 2006;Brancewicz et al, 2007;Huotari et al, 2007;Choudhary et al, 2011;Brancewicz et al, 2013;Sharma et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extraction of the Compton profile from experimental spectra is a standard procedure including a series of energy-and geometry-dependent corrections. However, there are still small but significant discrepancies observed between theoretical and experimental Compton profiles even in highmomentum regions, where theoretical description of core electrons should work well (Brancewicz et al, 2013). There are two possible sources of this discrepancy: one is the uncertainty associated with the experimental background measurements and the other is the influence of multiple-scattered photons (MSC) in experimental spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%