We introduce the quasiminimal subshifts, subshifts having only finitely many subsystems. With N-actions, their theory essentially reduces to the theory of minimal systems, but with Z-actions, the class is much larger. We show many examples of such subshifts, and in particular construct a universal system with only a single proper subsystem, refuting a conjecture of [Delvenne, Kůrka, Blondel, '05].5 The one-point subshift is the simplest minimal subshift, but any minimal subshift can be used here, though naturally at the expense of countability.6 Here, we use the term extension in the sense of containment (monomorphisms), and not in the sense of factoring (epimorphisms). This usage is somewhat nonstandard in the theory of dynamical systems, but it is fitting for quasiminimal systems, since they are inductively built, in finitely many steps, from smaller quasiminimal systems by adding new points.7 Strictly speaking, we could also consider S Z with an N-action (obtaining a rather unnatural definition of a subshift), but the convention is that S M uses the natural shift action of M .