2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23247-4_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computability on Quasi-Polish Spaces

Abstract: We investigate the effectivizations of several equivalent definitions of quasi-Polish spaces and study which characterizations hold effectively. Being a computable effectively open image of the Baire space is a robust notion that admits several characterizations. We show that some natural effectivizations of quasi-metric spaces are strictly stronger.Proposition 6.1. The space [α, 1] < is an effective quasi-Polish space iff α is left-c.e. relative to the halting set.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in [15,3,4], CQP-spaces do satisfy effective versions of several important properties of quasi-Polish spaces. E.g.…”
Section: Computable Quasi-polish Spacesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in [15,3,4], CQP-spaces do satisfy effective versions of several important properties of quasi-Polish spaces. E.g.…”
Section: Computable Quasi-polish Spacesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Quasi-Polish spaces [2] have several characterisations. Effectivizing one of them we obtain the following notion identified implicitly in [15] and explicitly in [3,4]. Definition 1.…”
Section: Computable Quasi-polish Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can also show that Theorem 5.1 holds for computable quasi-Polish spaces. Here, roughly speaking, a computable quasi-Polish space is a represented second countable T 0 space which is the image of a computable open surjection from ω ω (which almost corresponds to the effective version of Fact 4.2; see also [6,14]).…”
Section: Louveau-type Effectivizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By effectivizing the arguments in Examples 5.5 and 5.6 to calculate the lightface complexity, we observe that Lemma 5.14 implies Theorems 5.2 and 5.3, which also deduces Theorem 5.1 for X = ω ω . To prove Theorem 5.1 for computable Polish X, first note that if X is computable Polish (indeed, if X is computable quasi-Polish; see [6,14]), then there exists a total computable open surjection δ : ω ω → X; see also Fact 4.2. Then for a function f :…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%