1997
DOI: 10.1109/59.589609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation-free preconditioners for the parallel solution of power system problems

Abstract: Solution of a set of linear equations A x = b is a recurrent problem in power system analysis. Because of computational dependencies, direct methods have proven of limited value in both parallel and highly vectorized computing environments. The preconditioned conjugate gradient method has been suggested as a better alternative to direct methods. The preconditioning step itself is not particularly well suited to parallel processing. Partitioned inverse representations of A are better suited to high performance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most sequential algorithms are LU-based direct solvers as they do not suffer from ill-conditioning. However, Iterative solvers such as the Conjugate Gradient method, which have been around since the 90s [119], are re-gaining traction for their scalability and parallel computing advancement.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most sequential algorithms are LU-based direct solvers as they do not suffer from ill-conditioning. However, Iterative solvers such as the Conjugate Gradient method, which have been around since the 90s [119], are re-gaining traction for their scalability and parallel computing advancement.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For large and sparse systems, Krylov subspace methods (conjugate gradient, GMRES, etc.) have advantages over direct methods in terms of better parallelism and less memory requirement [7,8]. However, in most cases, a preconditioner is essential for accelerating the convergence rate of Krylov subspace-based iterative methods [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where linear and nonlinear functions, the Jacobian matrix will have many zero elements (sparse matrix) [27][28][29]. This will enable the straightforward application of sparse-matrix techniques for linear-system solution, such as preconditioned Krylov subspace methods [27][28][29].…”
Section: Harmonic Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will enable the straightforward application of sparse-matrix techniques for linear-system solution, such as preconditioned Krylov subspace methods [27][28][29].…”
Section: Harmonic Balancementioning
confidence: 99%