2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2007.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of mixed mode stress intensity factors in a four-point bend specimen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 16 shows the results for the FPB specimen. In this example, the crack opening mode II is the most important, and ‫ܭ‬ ூூ values are also calculated and compared to the reference solution (Shahani and Tabatabaei, 2008). In this example, for small cracks, the J-integral method gives more accurate results compared with displacement based ones.…”
Section: Single Edge Notched Tension (Sent)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 16 shows the results for the FPB specimen. In this example, the crack opening mode II is the most important, and ‫ܭ‬ ூூ values are also calculated and compared to the reference solution (Shahani and Tabatabaei, 2008). In this example, for small cracks, the J-integral method gives more accurate results compared with displacement based ones.…”
Section: Single Edge Notched Tension (Sent)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare the performance and accuracy of the different schemes for calculating the SIF, six examples are solved and compared with their respective reference solutions, which can be found in Tada et al (1985) for specimen cases, Shahani and Tabatabaei (2008) for the FPB specimen and in API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 (2007) for cylinder cases. The material properties are set to ‫ܧ‬ = ‫ܽܲܩ002‬ and ߥ = 0.3 to solve the linear elasticity problem.…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pure II mode fracture can hopefully be achieved by imposing load far sufficiently from the crack plane. [6] pointed out when C/D is greater than 1.4, β II in Eq. (4) is nearly to 1, meaning a valid pure shear condition, and [7] suggested that C/D should be 1.5 or greater to eliminate the effects of K I and T-stress for pure mode II fracture.…”
Section: Modified Mts Criterion For I/ii Mixed Mode Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a four-point bending notched beam shown in Fig.1, mixed mode SIFs, even Tstress were investigated for some specific cases, such as C1=0 or small values of C1/C [6,7,8] . From Fig.1, C1/C should take values from 0 to 1 so that a wide range of K I /K II values can be covered for a complete cracking initiation curve.…”
Section: Modified Mts Criterion For I/ii Mixed Mode Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murakami [4] used the body force method to calculate their stress intensity factors, for a crack originating from a corner of a square hole in an infinite plate in tension. A mixed mode stress intensity factors of the bend specimen are computed by Finite Element Method (FEM) to determine the effects of different crack location and loading distances from the middle of the specimen [5] . Laurencin [6] employed a statistical analysis based on weakest link theory, to describe the brittle fracture induced at singularities in ceramic materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%