1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02841751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of regional gravity anomaly — A novel approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4, the magnetic eld of a cube-shaped 2D block is calculated using the MATLAB function and equation 3 for slopes 0, 30, 60, and 90 degrees. The angle of inclination varies sharply for different slopes, and for slopes 0 and 90 degrees, the diagram's meeting point of the angle of inclination with the xaxes (x = 0) is close to the edges of the 2D model (Mallick & Sharma, 1997;Stocco et al, 2009). Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Of Arti Cial Magnetic Datamentioning
confidence: 81%
“…4, the magnetic eld of a cube-shaped 2D block is calculated using the MATLAB function and equation 3 for slopes 0, 30, 60, and 90 degrees. The angle of inclination varies sharply for different slopes, and for slopes 0 and 90 degrees, the diagram's meeting point of the angle of inclination with the xaxes (x = 0) is close to the edges of the 2D model (Mallick & Sharma, 1997;Stocco et al, 2009). Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Of Arti Cial Magnetic Datamentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The angle of inclination varies sharply for different slopes. For slopes 0 and 90 degrees, the diagram's meeting point of the angle of inclination with the x-axes (x = 0) is close to the edges of the 2D model (Mallick & Sharma, 1997;Stocco et al, 2009). Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Of Artificial Magnetic Datamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Nevertheless, other filters detect the anomaly masses' horizontal boundaries. Also, due to fitting to data and their flexibility using the lateral anomalies separation and edges' position (the estimation of the boundary of geological structures such as a fault or dyke), considered as analytical signal filters and derivatives (Blakely, 1995;Blakely & Simpson, 1986;Griffin, 1949;Hinze, 1990;Hosseini et al, 2014;Kaufman & Keller, 1981;Loke & Barker, 1996;Mallick & Sharma, 1997;Miller & Singh, 1994;Paterson & Reeves, 1985;Roest et al, 1992;Talwani & Ewing, 1960;Talwani et al, 1959;Telford et al, 1990;Wijns et al, 2005). Since the 1970s, various semiautomatic methods have been developed using gradients (derivatives) of the magnetic field anomalies to determine geometric parameters such as boundaries' locations and the causative sources' depths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%