“…More specifically, [8], based on the literature's examination, determined the dominant RAA methods, and categorized them into three principal classes, i.e., the qualitative, the quantitative, and the hybrid (semi-quantitative or qualitative-quantitative) methods, wherein the first ones are grounded mainly on the safety-managers' capability, the second ones express the risk by a mathematical relation in conjunction with real accident data recorded in a workplace, and finally, the third ones are characterized by a high complexity due to their ad-hoc feature. A plethora of other works confirm the results of this study, and also the importance of its classification, like the articles of (i) da Costa et al (2020) [18], Gul and Celik (2018) [19], AriamuthuVenkidasalapathy et al (2018) [20], Ozkan and Uluta (2017) [21] (for quantitative RAA), (ii) Athar et al (2019) [22], Sanmiquel-Pera et al (2019) [23], Domínguez et al (2019) [24] (for qualitative RAA), and (iii) Kharzi et al (2020) [25], Cinar and Cebi (2020) [26], Mutlu et al (2019) [27], Bora et al, (2019) [28], Kamsu-Foguem and Tiako (2017) [29], Zheng et al (2017) [30], Mentes and Ozen (2015) [31] (for hybrid RAA).…”