2013
DOI: 10.1364/oe.21.000087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of tightly-focused laser beams in the FDTD method

Abstract: Abstract:We demonstrate how a tightly-focused coherent TEM mn laser beam can be computed in the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. The electromagnetic field around the focus is decomposed into a plane-wave spectrum, and approximated by a finite number of plane waves injected into the FDTD grid using the total-field/scattered-field (TF/SF) method. We provide an error analysis, and guidelines for the discrete approximation. We analyze the scattering of the beam from layered spaces and individual scatte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this assumption is commonly made for optical Monte Carlo simulations in both the ballistic and diffuse regime, beam steering due to inhomogeneous scatterers (e.g. organelles, glands, and vascular structures) is a known phenomenon that is difficult to model in a traditional ray-tracing Monte Carlo simulation, but has been investigated using various alternative methods [27, [44][45][46][47][48]. In addition, note that our results assume that the imaging is limited by SBR (contrast) and not limited by SNR (a photon-limited situation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this assumption is commonly made for optical Monte Carlo simulations in both the ballistic and diffuse regime, beam steering due to inhomogeneous scatterers (e.g. organelles, glands, and vascular structures) is a known phenomenon that is difficult to model in a traditional ray-tracing Monte Carlo simulation, but has been investigated using various alternative methods [27, [44][45][46][47][48]. In addition, note that our results assume that the imaging is limited by SBR (contrast) and not limited by SNR (a photon-limited situation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While more advanced numerical models of light propagation exist, (e.g., the FDTD method), the BPM utilizes an approximation (discussed in the following paragraphs) to the Helmholtz equation that places less-restrictive constraints on the numerical step-size and spatial grid resolution (e.g., the FDTD method requires a fine spatial sampling of λ /20) [2325]. While there are many variations of the BPM, here we employ the split-step spectral-domain method, a common numerical technique for solving non-linear partial differential equations.…”
Section: The Fractal Propagation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). 14 The TF/SF method also offers the possibility to inject a plane wave at an oblique angle, which is important for the modeling of focused beams in the FDTD method, since it facilitates the modeling of any desired beam as long as we have its ASPW description, 8,9 as will be seen in the next section. In the second region, the scattered-field region, which surrounds the total-field region, only the scattered fields exist.…”
Section: Finite Difference Time Domain Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 In a similar approach, the minimum number of plane waves ðM min Þ needed to get a focus with no numerical artifacts due to sampling in the spatial range of size ðy m Þ, and for a maximum incident angle θ max (which is the definition for the maximum divergence angle for a focused beam) is found to be This sampling problem has been addressed before in general terms.…”
Section: Angular Spectrum Of Plane Wavesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation