2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2006.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of transmissions and reflections in geometrical optics via the reduced Liouville equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, one probably needs to modify slope limiter near the interface by using the Hamiltonian-preserving principle across the interface, as in [21]. For the numerical examples in the next section, we just use the monotonized central-difference limiter, which works well for our examples; therefore we do not consider this issue here.…”
Section: The Numerical Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, one probably needs to modify slope limiter near the interface by using the Hamiltonian-preserving principle across the interface, as in [21]. For the numerical examples in the next section, we just use the monotonized central-difference limiter, which works well for our examples; therefore we do not consider this issue here.…”
Section: The Numerical Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Liouville equation (4.1) can be solved by a standard finite difference or finite volume shock capturing method, such schemes face difficulties when the Hamiltonian is discontinuous, since ignoring the discontinuity of the Hamiltonian during the computation will result in solutions inconsistent with the notion of the (physically relevant) solution defined in the preceding subsection. Even with a smoothed Hamiltonian, it is usually impossible-at least in the case of partial transmission and reflection-to obtain the correct amount of transmissions and reflections (see some numerical examples in [19,21]). A smoothed Hamiltonian will also give a severe time step constraint like ∆t ∼ O(∆x∆p), where ∆t, ∆x and ∆p are time step, mesh sizes in the x-and p-directions respectively.…”
Section: 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the first Eulerian numerical methods for high frequency waves that are able to capture correctly the transmission and reflection of waves through the barriers or interfaces. The framework also extends to reduced Liouville equation [21], where the interface condition uses directly Snell's Law to determine one side of the wave direction vector from the other side. It has also been extended to high frequency elastic waves [12], and high frequency waves in random media [13] with diffusive interfaces, where radiative transfer equation rather than the Liouville equation was used.…”
Section: 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is mainly because the slope along the interface is just zero in those examples. In general, one probably needs to modify slope limiter near the interface, again by using the Hamiltonian preserving principle across the interface, as in [13].…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%