1995
DOI: 10.1115/1.2812758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computation of Turbulent Evaporating Sprays: Eulerian Versus Lagrangian Approach

Abstract: A new Eulerian model for turbulent evaporating sprays is presented. It comprises droplet heating and evaporation processes by solving separate transport equations for the droplet’s temperature and diameter. A Lagrangian approach, which we have discussed in detail on other occasions, is used in comparing the results of the new method. A comparison with experimental data shows that both approaches are successful in predicting the main features of turbulent evaporating sprays.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hallman et al (1995) focused on the computation of turbulent evaporating sprays using the Eulerian and Lagrangian approaches. Recently, Lee et al (2002) simulated the gas-particle flow in a 45…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hallman et al (1995) focused on the computation of turbulent evaporating sprays using the Eulerian and Lagrangian approaches. Recently, Lee et al (2002) simulated the gas-particle flow in a 45…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaporation process of a drop composed of a mixture of hydrocarbons can be divided into three fields for modelling mass and heat transfer (Prommersberger et al, 1999, Aggarwal andPeng, 1994). The most fully developed approaches (model DLM, Diffusion Limit Model) take account of the heterogeneous temperature field in the droplet, of the influence of the drop and the multi-component composition of the hydrocarbon (Hallmann et al, 1995, Li, 1995. Certain models treat drop heating and vaporization simultaneously, while others assume that the droplet warms up initially without evaporating, and that when it reaches a sufficient temperature, it vaporizes (Schmehl et al, 1999).…”
Section: Gas Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EL approach is the most widely used approach for engineering applications, but it suffers from several disadvantages as described in [5] [6]. This approach is not able to adequately capture mass, momentum and energy inter-phase exchange in regions where the liquid void fraction dominates, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%