33rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-2721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Aeroelastic Analyses of a Low-Boom Supersonic Configuration

Abstract: An overview of NASA's Commercial Supersonic Technology (CST) Aeroservoelasticity (ASE) element is provided with a focus on recent computational aeroelastic analyses of a low-boom supersonic configuration developed by Lockheed-Martin and referred to as the N+2 configuration. The overview includes details of the computational models developed to date including a linear finite element model (FEM), linear unsteady aerodynamic models, unstructured CFD grids, and CFD-based aeroelastic analyses. In addition, a summar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the APE-inviscid fine grid is used as a comparison to the relatively coarse APEinviscid grid used in the majority of the sensitivity studies. Previous grid studies for this concept vehicle have indicated only minor differences between a coarse grid and a fine grid (10 times more points) [19].…”
Section: Ape Model Of N 2 Supersonic Transportmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the APE-inviscid fine grid is used as a comparison to the relatively coarse APEinviscid grid used in the majority of the sensitivity studies. Previous grid studies for this concept vehicle have indicated only minor differences between a coarse grid and a fine grid (10 times more points) [19].…”
Section: Ape Model Of N 2 Supersonic Transportmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Leveraging symmetry, a modal solution was performed on the FEM semispan by properly defining boundary conditions [2,8,19]. The symmetric modes of the vehicle provide adequate coupling for the propulsion system for this sensitivity analysis, which is not investigating off-nominal thrust asymmetries.…”
Section: Vehicle Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. 3 The key features to note for this study are the long slender vehicle profile and the three gas turbine engines. Two of the engines are mounted under the wing, with a third mounted in the back along the centerline of the fuselage.…”
Section: A N+2 Commercial Supersonic Transport Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the FEM was discretized into constant property design zones, and an optimizer was used to adjust the structural properties using the design variables defined within these zones. 3 Skins assumed a sandwich approach consisting of graphite and Bismaleimide (BMI) unidirectional tape with a honeycomb core, resulting in three independent design variables per zone ( either 0, 45, or 90 degree plies; core thickness remains constant in sizing). The design of the substructure also assumed a sandwich approach with graphite and BMI fabric facesheets.…”
Section: Vehicle Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The Fun3D code has various configuration options to include tools outside of the standard flow solver. NASA is using Fun3D as the primary tool for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based ASE analysis 4 and it will serve as the analysis environment for the final APSE model. Finally, the stand alone propulsion system model will be coupled into a rigid body supersonic commercial transport in Fun3D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%