13th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (28th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference) 2007
DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-3589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Analyses of Offset Stream Nozzles for Noise Reduction

Abstract: The Wind computational fluid dynamics code was used to perform a series of simulations on two offset stream nozzle concepts for jet noise reduction. The first concept used an S-duct to direct the secondary stream to the lower side of the nozzle. = nozzle plenum total temperature u = local axial velocity ujet = mass-averaged axial velocity of primary jet x, y, z = coordinate system ( ) = used to denote difference in discharge or thrust coefficient of the current configuration from the baseline configuration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned, reduction in the velocity gradient is expected to reduce the production rate for turbulent kinetic energy, k. Previous experiments and computations in dual-stream nozzles with fan flow deflectors have shown reduced values of k on the underside of the jet (Shupe et al 2007). Importantly, the experiments have shown a correlation between velocity gradients and the end of the potential core of the jet (Dippold et al 2007). Given that the jet has a finite axial extent, it is thus possible to reduce k throughout the underside of the jet.…”
Section: Fan Flow Deflectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, reduction in the velocity gradient is expected to reduce the production rate for turbulent kinetic energy, k. Previous experiments and computations in dual-stream nozzles with fan flow deflectors have shown reduced values of k on the underside of the jet (Shupe et al 2007). Importantly, the experiments have shown a correlation between velocity gradients and the end of the potential core of the jet (Dippold et al 2007). Given that the jet has a finite axial extent, it is thus possible to reduce k throughout the underside of the jet.…”
Section: Fan Flow Deflectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A separate paper details the parallel CFD analyses including performance predictions for these two concepts. 5 Computations for the vane deflectors included a detailed optimization. The performance predictions of all the OST nozzle concepts are compared here.…”
Section: Appendix: Performance Of All Offset Stream Technology Nozzlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 There are four other papers from the OST study that form a complete description of the program. A companion CFD study examining the vane deflector and s-duct nozzles was performed by Dippold et al 5 The experimental results from NATR, acoustics and Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) based velocity measurements in the exhaust plume, were reported by Brown et al 6 and a comparison of experimental results between UCI and NASA Glenn was detailed by Zaman et al 7 The results of the DOE study were reported by Henderson et al 8 The experimental results at NATR indicate that the wedge deflectors do reduce the noise on the lower side of the nozzle at downstream angles. However, at other angles on the lower side and all angles on the sideline and upper side the noise was increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic emissions over a range of azimuthal angles toward the ground are reduced 2 . This research effort continues a series of RANS investigations at the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center, that focus on the "offset-stream" methods for jet noise suppression [21][22][23][24][25] . In the current work, the emphasis is on the asymmetric jet resulting from an external wedge-shaped deflector placed in the bypass stream of a nozzle simulating takeoff conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%