2005
DOI: 10.4050/1.3092861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Analysis of a Microtab-Based Aerodynamic Load Control System for Rotor Blades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, they investigated the effect of chordwise positioning of the GF, showing that increased upstream positioning enlarges the hysteresis loop, degrades the lift enhancement, increases drag, and decreases the nose-down pitching moment. Similar limits were found also in [10,14,28,29]. Matalanis et al [30] carried out two-and three-dimensional simulations, together with experimental measurements, on a VR-12 section equipped with a deployable GF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, they investigated the effect of chordwise positioning of the GF, showing that increased upstream positioning enlarges the hysteresis loop, degrades the lift enhancement, increases drag, and decreases the nose-down pitching moment. Similar limits were found also in [10,14,28,29]. Matalanis et al [30] carried out two-and three-dimensional simulations, together with experimental measurements, on a VR-12 section equipped with a deployable GF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Experiments conducted on airfoils equipped with GFs highlighted the capability of these devices to significantly increase lift without severe drawbacks in terms of drag increment [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Several numerical computations have investigated the behavior of GFs [9,[11][12][13][14][15]. These studies highlighted how such movable devices allow to increase the lift, and in particular the maximum lift and the lift to drag ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MT height relative to the chord length measured in percentage is 1%c, 1.5%c and 2%c. These series of cases has been designed according to the previous studies of Standish et al [32], Mayda et al [26] and Yen et al [21], where the maximum translation was estimated in the order of the boundary layer thickness at the device position: 1-2% of the chord length and the optimal location for a lower surface tab in terms of lift and drag was found to be around 95% of c. The MTs are placed on the pressure surface and have been studied for ten different angles of attack, from 0 • to 9 • . The combination of all these positions for the MTs gives 120 different cases to study (Ayerdi-Zaton et al [33]).…”
Section: Microtab Lay-outmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the surface could be mounted near the trailing edge as a spoiler (Scott et al, 1997). This has a similar effect as microtabs (Standish andvan Dam, 2005, Mayda et al, 2005), which are already under investigation for load control on wind …”
Section: Implementation On Wind Turbinesmentioning
confidence: 94%