1998
DOI: 10.1090/qam/1668732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational anatomy: an emerging discipline

Abstract: Abstract.This paper studies mathematical methods in the emerging new discipline of Computational Anatomy. Herein we formalize the Brown/Washington University model of anatomy following the global pattern theory introduced in [1,2], in which anatomies are represented as deformable templates, collections of 0,1,2,3-dimensional manifolds. Typical structure is carried by the template with the variabilities accommodated via the application of random transformations to the background manifolds. The anatomical model … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
431
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 545 publications
(432 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(182 reference statements)
0
431
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fox et al, 2001). All these efforts draw on methods from the rapidly growing field of computational anatomy (see e.g., Ashburner et al, 2003;Bankman, 1999: Bookstein, 2001: Chung, 2001: Csernansky et al, 1998Davatzikos, 1996Davatzikos, , 2001Drury and Van Essen, 1997;Evans et al, 1994;Fischl and Dale, 2000;Fitzpatrick and Sonka, 2000;Gee and Bajcsy, 1998;Gerig et al, 2001;Grenander and Miller, 1998;Leahy and Insana, 2001;Miller et al, 2002;Sereno et al, 1996;Thompson and Toga, 2003a,b;Thompson et al, 2000a,b, 2001a,b, cf. Toga, 1998Toga and Mazziotta, 2002; see other papers in this issue for recent developments and reviews).…”
Section: Computational Anatomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fox et al, 2001). All these efforts draw on methods from the rapidly growing field of computational anatomy (see e.g., Ashburner et al, 2003;Bankman, 1999: Bookstein, 2001: Chung, 2001: Csernansky et al, 1998Davatzikos, 1996Davatzikos, , 2001Drury and Van Essen, 1997;Evans et al, 1994;Fischl and Dale, 2000;Fitzpatrick and Sonka, 2000;Gee and Bajcsy, 1998;Gerig et al, 2001;Grenander and Miller, 1998;Leahy and Insana, 2001;Miller et al, 2002;Sereno et al, 1996;Thompson and Toga, 2003a,b;Thompson et al, 2000a,b, 2001a,b, cf. Toga, 1998Toga and Mazziotta, 2002; see other papers in this issue for recent developments and reviews).…”
Section: Computational Anatomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This distortion can be expressed using an operator, here denoted by L, which is typically the CauchyNavier differential operator L = mj 2 + (l + m)j(j T ! ), or powers of the Laplacian on space or space time (Christensen et al, 1996;Dupuis et al, 1998;Grenander and Miller, 1998;Toga, 1998;Toga and Thompson, 2003a,b). These operators tend to penalize high values of the Laplacian j 2 u(r) of the flow, as well as high values of the gradient of the divergence of the flow j(j T !…”
Section: Mathematics Of Matching: Covariant Pdesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spatial normalization involves the registration of images and the generation of a stereotaxic atlas that represents the statistical distribution of the group at each voxel (Friston et al, 1995;Mazziotta et al, 1995;Thompson and Toga, 1997;Grenander and Miller, 1998;Guimond et al, 2000). The registration of diffusion tensor images has generally been performed in a similar way to the registration of T1-weighted or SPGR MR images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where it is impractical to predict anatomical domains of damage a priori, researchers tend to use a voxel-based approach to characterize statistical differences between groups Rugg-Gunn et al, 2001). VBA involves spatial normalization of brain images to a stereotactic 3D space (Friston 1995;Mazziotta 1995;Thompson, 1997;Grenander, 1998). In order to produce a more normalized distribution of image data, a smoothing function is typically applied to the images (Ashburner and Friston, 2000;Good et al, 2001;Watkins et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%