2013
DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational and experimental characterization of skin mechanics: identifying current challenges and future directions

Abstract: The characterization of skin mechanics has many clinical implications and has been an active area of research for the past few decades. Biomechanical models have evolved from earlier empirical models to state-of-the-art structural models that provide linkage between tissue microstructure and macroscopic stress-strain response. To maximize the accuracy and predictive capabilities of such computational models, there is a need to reliably identify often a large number of unknown model parameters. This is critical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 176 publications
(247 reference statements)
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order therefore to fully characterise the mechanical properties of skin, it will be necessary to take into account anisotropy and viscoelasticity whilst measuring local stress and strain at multiple length scales and preferably in three dimensions (3D). A further challenge is to reconcile in vitro mechanical measurements with the non‐invasive determination of skin biophysical properties in vivo in order to exploit biophysical knowledge of skin in the clinical environment …”
Section: Current State Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order therefore to fully characterise the mechanical properties of skin, it will be necessary to take into account anisotropy and viscoelasticity whilst measuring local stress and strain at multiple length scales and preferably in three dimensions (3D). A further challenge is to reconcile in vitro mechanical measurements with the non‐invasive determination of skin biophysical properties in vivo in order to exploit biophysical knowledge of skin in the clinical environment …”
Section: Current State Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, as pointed out by Jor et al [6] in their review paper on the computational and experimental characterization of skin, a significant limiting factor in the development and adoption of advanced constitutive theories is the scarcity and relevance of captured experimental data. There are several fundamental aspects, or more precisely, reasons and questions associated with this observation:…”
Section: Perspective and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a finite element modelling context, it implies that using a single set of mechanical properties for the stratum corneum would limit the domain of validity of the simulation results to specific conditions. A wide array of experimental and clinical measurement techniques are used to characterise particular aspects of skin biology and biophysics (Alexiades-Armenakas, 2007;Batisse et al, 2002;Bellemere et al, 2009;Delalleau et al, 2006;Diridollou et al, 2000;Gunner et al, 1979;Hendriks et al, 2006;Jor et al, 2013;Limbert and Simms, 2013;Tonge et al, 2013a;Tonge et al, 2013b;Wan Abas, 1994). Nevertheless, complementary approaches based on mathematical and computational modelling techniques offer promising avenues to further our understanding of the skin (Areias et al, 2003;Bischoff et al, 2000;Boissieux et al, 2000;Buganza Tepole and Kuhl, 2014;Cavicchi et al, 2009;Duan et al, 2000;Evans, 2009;Flynn and McCormack, 2008a, b;Flynn andMcCormack, 2009, 2010;Hendriks et al, 2006;Hendriks et al, 2003;Kuwazuru et al, 2008;Larrabee and Galt, 1986a, b;Larrabee and Sutton, 1986;Lévêque and Audoly, 2013;Tepole et al, 2014a;Tepole et al, 2014b;Tepole et al, 2011;Zöllner et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%