2020
DOI: 10.24937/2542-2324-2020-4-394-21-30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational and experimental determination of waterjet aeration exposure in waves

Abstract: Object and purpose of research. The object of research was a model of a fast seaworthy boat with discretevariable bottom deadrise and two waterjet propulsors. The purposes of research were to experimentally determine hydrodynamic characteristics of the model in calm water and head regular waves corresponding to the irregular waves of sea states 3 and 4, as well as to determine the possibility of air penetration to waterjet inlets for two variants of their arrangement on model bottom in head-wave conditions, nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Park et al [20] compared the flow line and pressure distribution obtained through numerical simulation and experiment to understand flow characteristics in the inlet passage and predict the position of stagnation point in the labial part. Dyakova et al [21] improved the propulsion efficiency of the device by changing the position of the water inlet through a numerical fluid dynamics method but did not analyse the relationship between water inlet angle and conduit length. On the basis of the basic principle of waterjet propulsion, Kortunova and Yakovleva [22] evaluated water flow at the inlet passage of a waterjet propulsion device in a self-propulsion test and described the influence of its coverage area on induction efficiency.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park et al [20] compared the flow line and pressure distribution obtained through numerical simulation and experiment to understand flow characteristics in the inlet passage and predict the position of stagnation point in the labial part. Dyakova et al [21] improved the propulsion efficiency of the device by changing the position of the water inlet through a numerical fluid dynamics method but did not analyse the relationship between water inlet angle and conduit length. On the basis of the basic principle of waterjet propulsion, Kortunova and Yakovleva [22] evaluated water flow at the inlet passage of a waterjet propulsion device in a self-propulsion test and described the influence of its coverage area on induction efficiency.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%