39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2001
DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational and experimental studies of asymmetric pitch/plunge flapping - The secret of biological flyers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smoke-wire was installed perpendicular to the wing and the flow direction, and was located 2.51C (C: mean chord length of the hind-wing) from the wing tip of the fore-wing and 0.59C from the leading edge of the fore-wing. The range of the reduced frequency was determined based on Chasman and Chakravarthy (2001), who used a dragonfly model seven-times larger in size than a real dragonfly and chose wing beat frequencies of 0.57, 1.00 and 1.59, which match the beat frequencies of real dragonflies, in order to achieve dynamic similarity. The wing beat frequencies in the present study were determined as 0.96 and 1.43, which correspond to the reduced frequencies of K = 0.150 and 0.225, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Set-up and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smoke-wire was installed perpendicular to the wing and the flow direction, and was located 2.51C (C: mean chord length of the hind-wing) from the wing tip of the fore-wing and 0.59C from the leading edge of the fore-wing. The range of the reduced frequency was determined based on Chasman and Chakravarthy (2001), who used a dragonfly model seven-times larger in size than a real dragonfly and chose wing beat frequencies of 0.57, 1.00 and 1.59, which match the beat frequencies of real dragonflies, in order to achieve dynamic similarity. The wing beat frequencies in the present study were determined as 0.96 and 1.43, which correspond to the reduced frequencies of K = 0.150 and 0.225, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Set-up and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%