2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25453-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Approaches for Gene Prediction: A Comparative Survey

Abstract: Abstract. Accurate gene structure prediction plays a fundamental role in functional annotation of genes. The main focus of gene prediction methods is to find patterns in long DNA sequences that indicate the presence of genes. The problem of gene prediction is an important problem in the field of bioinformatics. With the explosive growth of genomic information there is a need for computational approaches that facilitate gene location, structure and functional prediction. In this paper, we survey various computa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies, which have evaluated prokaryotic CDS predictors generally only compared a small number of tools, focussing on algorithm design, and did not go into depth when reporting prediction accuracy with few other informative metrics used (Al-Turaiki et al, 2011;Mathe ´et al, 2002). A more recent study, BEACON (Kalkatawi et al, 2015), considered a small range of metrics including genes 'denoted as identical, similar, unique with overlap or unique without overlap' to either a reference annotation or from the output of three pipelines (PGAP, AAMG and RAST).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies, which have evaluated prokaryotic CDS predictors generally only compared a small number of tools, focussing on algorithm design, and did not go into depth when reporting prediction accuracy with few other informative metrics used (Al-Turaiki et al, 2011;Mathe ´et al, 2002). A more recent study, BEACON (Kalkatawi et al, 2015), considered a small range of metrics including genes 'denoted as identical, similar, unique with overlap or unique without overlap' to either a reference annotation or from the output of three pipelines (PGAP, AAMG and RAST).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more work on gene prediction using supervised learning, see the survey by Al-Turaiki et al . [19]. However, one major drawback of these supervised algorithms is that they typically require large amounts of labeled data to train a classifier.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of protein coding regions in genomic or transcript sequences is a very important but overlooked subtask for genome annotation. Many well-known gene prediction tools (e.g., GenScan Burge and Karlin (1997), Augustus Stanke, Steinkamp, Waack and Morgenstern (2004)) are integrated models, in which the task of identifying gene structure is first divided into subtasks such as the prediction of functional sites and coding regions, and then these subtasks are integrated in a structured learning framework for the prediction of gene structure Al-Turaiki, Mathkour, Touir and Hammami (2011). Moreover, coding features is also very important for computational methods to discriminate mRNAs from long non-coding RNAs Li, Zhang and Zhou (2014); Tong and Liu (2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%