2008
DOI: 10.1158/aacr.edb-08-8252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Chemistry in Early-Stage Drug Discovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LHC searches have benefitted immensely from developments in jet substructure techniques over the past many years and have enabled investigations of many hitherto challenging signals. Starting from the earlier ideas in jet substructure [20][21][22][23] we now have a large toolkit of methods suited to a diverse array of theoretical and experimental challenges. As mentioned, the lack of any unambiguous indications of new physics at collider and non-collider experiments is perplexing though.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LHC searches have benefitted immensely from developments in jet substructure techniques over the past many years and have enabled investigations of many hitherto challenging signals. Starting from the earlier ideas in jet substructure [20][21][22][23] we now have a large toolkit of methods suited to a diverse array of theoretical and experimental challenges. As mentioned, the lack of any unambiguous indications of new physics at collider and non-collider experiments is perplexing though.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly due to the fact that chiral enhancement as well as RG effects that enhance the dangerous Q LR operators are much smaller in the B d,s systems than in the K system. • Finally, the model allows naturally for S ψφ as high as 0.4 as hinted at by the most recent CDF and DØ data [38,39,40] and by an order of magnitude larger than the SM expectation, S ψφ ≃ 0.04. The strong correlation between S ψφ and A s SL shown in Figure 4 then would imply a significant departure of the latter observable from its tiny SM value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%