2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2018.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational complexity of the landscape II—Cosmological considerations

Abstract: We propose a new approach for multiverse analysis based on computational complexity, which leads to a new family of "computational" measure factors. By defining a cosmology as a space-time containing a vacuum with specified properties (for example small cosmological constant) together with rules for how time evolution will produce the vacuum, we can associate global time in a multiverse with clock time on a supercomputer which simulates it. We argue for a principle of "limited computational complexity" governi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(95 reference statements)
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, dynamical vacuum selection [8] on a network of string geometries [9] in a well-studied bubble cosmology [10] selects models with large numbers of gauge groups and axions, as well as strong coupling. However, concrete studies of the landscape are difficult due to its enormity [11,12,13,14,9,15], computational complexity [16,17,18,19,20], and undecidability [17]. It is therefore natural to expect that, in addition to the formal progress that is clearly required, data science techniques such as supervised machine learning will be necessary to understand the landscape; see for initial works [21,22,8,23] in this directions and [24,25,26,27,28,29,30] for additional promising results.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, dynamical vacuum selection [8] on a network of string geometries [9] in a well-studied bubble cosmology [10] selects models with large numbers of gauge groups and axions, as well as strong coupling. However, concrete studies of the landscape are difficult due to its enormity [11,12,13,14,9,15], computational complexity [16,17,18,19,20], and undecidability [17]. It is therefore natural to expect that, in addition to the formal progress that is clearly required, data science techniques such as supervised machine learning will be necessary to understand the landscape; see for initial works [21,22,8,23] in this directions and [24,25,26,27,28,29,30] for additional promising results.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons a statistical approach [111] to the landscape seems critical, and a natural question is how to study statistics (including possible vacuum and / or anthropic selection) of a set of vacua that cannot be read into memory or scanned over, particularly given that the difficulty of the problem is exacerbated by computational complexity [117][118][119].…”
Section: Remarks On Universality Machine Learning and The Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Persistent homology can be used to compare different distributions of string vacua (by summarizing what topological features are present and how they relate) and to understand where individual vacua reside within a distribution. We imagine that applying persistent homology to distributions of string vacua could be potentially useful for understanding vacuum selection (which becomes even more interesting when issues of computational complexity are considered [56][57][58][59]) or tunneling in the landscape. Moreover, by choosing only special vacua with certain phenomenologically interesting properties and studying the restricted distributions with persistent homology, we may learn which low-energy properties of a string vacuum are simultaneously allowed, and where they live.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%