Plasmonics - Principles and Applications 2012
DOI: 10.5772/51166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Electromagnetics in Plasmonics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, such classical approaches are excellent at predicting the global properties of plasmonic nanoparticles, such as their optical activity, near-field enhancement and photoheating properties, and how these change through the manipulation of, e.g., dielectric environment, particle composition, particle geometry, or particle–particle interaction. ,,,, Common techniques to implement the electrodynamic description of plasmonic systems range from the use of analytical expressions for spherical particles in the Mie theory to deploying general methods to study systems with arbitrary geometries. Among the variety of the latter methods, the most common examples in the literature are finite element methods (FEM) and finite-differences time-domain (FDTD) methods. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, such classical approaches are excellent at predicting the global properties of plasmonic nanoparticles, such as their optical activity, near-field enhancement and photoheating properties, and how these change through the manipulation of, e.g., dielectric environment, particle composition, particle geometry, or particle–particle interaction. ,,,, Common techniques to implement the electrodynamic description of plasmonic systems range from the use of analytical expressions for spherical particles in the Mie theory to deploying general methods to study systems with arbitrary geometries. Among the variety of the latter methods, the most common examples in the literature are finite element methods (FEM) and finite-differences time-domain (FDTD) methods. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is well known, for modeling of such complex plasmonic nanostructures as arrays of metasurfaces, several numerical methods can be used 13 . These methods can be divided into direct ones, such as finite difference or finite element methods -both in time (finite difference time domain) and frequency (finite difference frequency domain) domains, and indirect ones (such as modal methods), both relaying on the solutions of appropriate differential equations (differential approaches).…”
Section: Specification Of the Simulation Tool And Metasurfaces Of Intmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the physics of resonances, for such structures, a physically rich interplay of both Fano-type resonances of individual building blocks and lattice resonances due to periodic arrangements is expected. Clearly, understanding of such combined resonances requires a thorough and exact analysis 13 . The efficient exploitation of such advanced structures is based on the understanding of the interaction of light resulting in useful SP resonances, applicable in SPR sensing techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prosperous fabrication of such metamaterials, emerged a prominent consideration in the exploration of metamaterials by scientists from the diverse arenas. The realization of metamaterials paved the pathway for various tremendous applications, such as sub-wavelength imaging, solar cell design, and antennas [7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%