In an interview setting, 21 6th-graders from four public schools in south Taiwan were asked a series of questions, related to whole and decimal numbers, designed to assess their number sense. Eight students were randomly selected from both low and middle performance levels, and five were selected from a high-performance level, according to their mathematical capabilities. Results indicated that, regardless of performance level, very few number sense strategies (e.g. using benchmarks, estimation or numbers of magnitude) were used. The evidence also revealed that Taiwanese students tended to apply rule-based methods and standard written algorithms to explain their reasoning. Their inclination to use paper-and-pencil procedures narrowed their thinking and reasoning powers: this heavy reliance on written algorithms seemed to be a major impediment to the development of number sense.
RationaleThe recent Third International Mathematics and Science Study (Mullis et al., 2004) confirmed the evidence from previous research that Taiwanese students consistently achieve high marks in mathematics performance, involving written computation (Stevenson et al., 1986;Stigler et al., 1991;Stevenson et al., 1993;Beaton et al., 1997). However, McIntosh et al. (1992) claim that students who are highly skilled in paper-and-pencil computation (often the gauge by which success in mathematics is measured) may or may not have developed good number sense. The study of Reys & Yang (1998) confirmed that Taiwanese students' proficiency, in exact written computational performance, is not necessarily accompanied by good number sense. The Israeli teacher Muneer (1999) repeated this study with 9th-grade students and