DOI: 10.25148/etd.fi12111904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Evaluation of Wind Loads on Low- and High- Rise Buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result has been noticed by many authors as shown hereafter. In their application on tall buildings, Dagnew et al 32 have found that k-e model overpredicts the Cp at stagnation point and at flow separation point. This over-prediction is about 25%-30% at the flow stagnation point in the study of Wright and Easom.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This result has been noticed by many authors as shown hereafter. In their application on tall buildings, Dagnew et al 32 have found that k-e model overpredicts the Cp at stagnation point and at flow separation point. This over-prediction is about 25%-30% at the flow stagnation point in the study of Wright and Easom.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Following the works of Dagnew [52] and Huang et al [53], the power-law wind profile was created to account for the wind speed modifications due to presence of urban surroundings, shown in Figure 4 and given by:…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…he concluded that the estimated wind loads on buildings by using CFD is comparable with the results by wind tunnel test and those by building design codes are more conservative than the CFD and wind tunnel test. [4] examined the building model of Commonwealth Advisory Aeronautical Council (CAARC) which has dimensions of (30mx45mx183m) in the wind analysis. Such work has been on the basis of numerical approach with focus on the equations of Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) as well as the turbulence model of Large Eddy Simulation (LES).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the agreement deteriorated to some extent at sidewalls and enhanced at leeward wall. [3] examined the computational evaluations with regard to the wind loads on high as well as lo rise buildings. The model's dimensions have been (30.48mx45.72mx182.88m).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%