2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6nj01707j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational evidence that hyperconjugative orbital interactions are responsible for the stability of intramolecular Te⋯O/Te⋯S non-covalent interactions and comparable to hydrogen bonds in quasi-cyclic systems

Abstract: The intramolecular secondary bonding interactions involving quasi-cyclic tellurium are comparable to H-bond strength and partially governed by orbital interactions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical investigations on ChBs are mostly based on quantum mechanical calculations utilizing second order Mø ller-Plesset perturbation theory or density functional theory (DFT), ,, where the accuracy of these methods are often validated by high accuracy CCSD­(T) single point energy calculations of a subset of complexes. , , These investigations were carried to better understand: (i) the ChB bonding mechanism, (ii) the dominant forces involved in the formation of the ChB, (iii) the high directionality of the ChBs, , (iv) the strength of the ChB and how it can be fine-tuned (v) to compare ChB with other SBIs (vi) and to support experimental analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical investigations on ChBs are mostly based on quantum mechanical calculations utilizing second order Mø ller-Plesset perturbation theory or density functional theory (DFT), ,, where the accuracy of these methods are often validated by high accuracy CCSD­(T) single point energy calculations of a subset of complexes. , , These investigations were carried to better understand: (i) the ChB bonding mechanism, (ii) the dominant forces involved in the formation of the ChB, (iii) the high directionality of the ChBs, , (iv) the strength of the ChB and how it can be fine-tuned (v) to compare ChB with other SBIs (vi) and to support experimental analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenon of CB currently attracts great attention due to applicability of CB in biochemistry, drug design, , polymer science, crystal engineering, and supramolecular chemistry . Although heavier chalcogens, Se and Te, , are better CB donors because of their higher polarizability, the majority of recent reports deal with CBs involving more abundant S centers. Most common types of CB with S atoms are S···S, S···O, and S···N interactions that are widely available in proteins and also in some organic compounds. ,,, The CBs of sulfur with halogens (particularly with Cl centers in both organic species and metal complexes) are also known, albeit still unusual.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other reason is, that SBIs have more covalent character, but lighter chalcogens like oxygen or sulfur tend to interact with σ‐holes, whereas heavier chalcogen atoms like tellurium are more prone to hyperconjugation. For σ‐hole interactions like S⋅⋅⋅O and S⋅⋅⋅S, the electrostatic effect is decreasing due to less electronegativity of the outer atom, while the hyperconjugation for Te⋅⋅⋅O and Te⋅⋅⋅S increases due to better overlap [47] . If the chalcogen has more substituents, more σ‐holes are generated [48] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%