2022
DOI: 10.1042/bst20210863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational exploration of cellular communication in skin from emerging single-cell and spatial transcriptomic data

Abstract: Tissue development and homeostasis require coordinated cell–cell communication. Recent advances in single-cell sequencing technologies have emerged as a revolutionary method to reveal cellular heterogeneity with unprecedented resolution. This offers a great opportunity to explore cell–cell communication in tissues systematically and comprehensively, and to further identify signaling mechanisms driving cell fate decisions and shaping tissue phenotypes. Using gene expression information from single-cell transcri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial information in our MERFISH data offers unique advantages in predicting cell-cell interactions or communications. Previous large-scale predictions of cell-cell interactions or communications have been based on co-expression of ligand-receptor pairs derived from sequencing data 98 , which are prone to false positives 99, 100 . Indeed, to mitigate this problem, such predictions have often relied on validations by imaging experiment to probe whether the cells co-expressing the ligand-receptor pairs are indeed in contact or proximity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial information in our MERFISH data offers unique advantages in predicting cell-cell interactions or communications. Previous large-scale predictions of cell-cell interactions or communications have been based on co-expression of ligand-receptor pairs derived from sequencing data 98 , which are prone to false positives 99, 100 . Indeed, to mitigate this problem, such predictions have often relied on validations by imaging experiment to probe whether the cells co-expressing the ligand-receptor pairs are indeed in contact or proximity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include a Bayesian modelling method called DestVI ( 118 ); methods that infer spatial cell composition from scRNAseq data such as CellDART ( 119 ) and Tangram ( 120 ); a graph-based CNN method called DSTG ( 121 ) which was used to uncover cell states of pancreatic tumor tissues. On the other hand, the ability of ST to localize gene expression to specific cell phenotypes in the TME allows effective characterization of cellular communication, which is either through cell-cell direct contact or cell signaling of neighboring cells ( 122 ). Analytic tools developed for cellular communication include a scalable random forest-based method called MISTy ( 123 ), tested on human BC Visium data; a graph NN method called NCEM ( 124 ), tested on MERFISH, PhenoCylcer, and MIBI; a graph CNN model based on a curated list of interacting ligands and receptors, called GCNG ( 125 ), tested on SeqFISH and MERFISH.…”
Section: Ai-enabled Tme Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advance multiplex mRNA in-situ hybridization and imaging techniques can be applied to perform targeted observations to quantify accurate counts of ERV gene expressions. Complementary techniques combining hybridization-based single-cell sequencing and spatially resolved transcriptomics linked to computational tools would be better to understand cell-to-cell interactions in complex tissue biopsies [118][119][120] . A promising recent approach shows prefeasibility results from a noninvasive high-resolution technique that captures RNA profiling of full-thickness lesional and nonlesional biopsies from the same psoriatic patient 121 .…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%