2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2008.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational fluid dynamic simulations of coal-fired utility boilers: An engineering tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generalized theory of flame propagation shows that the ignition process is influenced predominantly by: the gas and particles heatup rate, the rate of coal devolatilisation, the diffusion rate of gaseous fuel and oxidizer species, and the rate of gas-phase reaction of devolatilisation products and oxygen. Although commercial CFD codes are able to predict fluid dynamics and transport phenomena fairly well, and thus volatile combustion as well to some extent, the main limitation of CFD modelling of coal ignition comes from sub-models for devolatilisation and char combustion [8]. The main reason for this is that commercial CFD codes still use simple sub-models for devolatilisation and char combustion.…”
Section: Ignition Phenomena Experimental and Numerical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The generalized theory of flame propagation shows that the ignition process is influenced predominantly by: the gas and particles heatup rate, the rate of coal devolatilisation, the diffusion rate of gaseous fuel and oxidizer species, and the rate of gas-phase reaction of devolatilisation products and oxygen. Although commercial CFD codes are able to predict fluid dynamics and transport phenomena fairly well, and thus volatile combustion as well to some extent, the main limitation of CFD modelling of coal ignition comes from sub-models for devolatilisation and char combustion [8]. The main reason for this is that commercial CFD codes still use simple sub-models for devolatilisation and char combustion.…”
Section: Ignition Phenomena Experimental and Numerical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial volatile composition values in weight fractions used as input for Eqs. (8) and (9) are estimated from the following correlations [35,36]: …”
Section: Implementation Of Fg Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical method, being able to reveal more detail on the combustion process, has been widely applied to investigate not only the pulverized-coal combustion in utility boilers [3][4][5][6][7], but also the blended coal combustion in blast furnaces [8], biomass combustion [9,10], and oxyfuel combustion [11,12]. Shen et al [13] carried out the numerical simulations of the combustion in a 1000 MW coal-fired utility boiler with ultra-supercritical parameter, single furnace and dual tangential circles using Mitsubishi company's technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes a review of the state-of-the-art of the various components or submodels required in a combustion model, the consideration of kinds of data required to evaluate and validate the predictions of combustion codes, and a summary of representative applications. As mentioned by Korytnyi et al [9] or Williams et al [10], the main limitation in CFD modeling of coal combustion is the use of simplified models for devolatilization, gasification of char and burning of volatile matters. This limitation comes from the need of a good characterization of the parameters involved in the different submodels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%