Currently,
volatile matter is generally treated as a postulate
substance or a mixture of light gases and tar with given proportion
in pulverized coal combustion (PCC) simulation. Whether those treatments
can well characterize the PCC or not remains unknown. Here, current
different coal devolatilization treatments are numerically evaluated
under the configuration of laminar stagnation PCC (Xia, M.; et al. Proc. Combust. Inst.
2017, 36, 2123–2130). The results show that the one-step model fitted
from the Chemical Percolation Devolatilization model prediction together
with detailed components and mechanism could give the best prediction
of the PCC characteristics. Different detailed volatile components
give similar predictions on the gas and particle properties with a
slight difference in the CO mass fraction due to their different components
fractions. The simplified global mechanism cannot reproduce the PCC
characteristics such as those of the detailed mechanisms, with earlier
particle ignition and much higher gas temperature and mass fractions
of production species. Assuming the volatile matter is pure methane
is not reasonable with obvious discrepancies on the particle and gas
properties compared with those of the optimal treatments even when
a detailed mechanism is used. Devolatilization model also plays a
significant role with the two-step model giving a lower flame location,
lower NO
x
, and higher polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons emissions compared with those of the optimal treatment.
The generality of the above conclusions will be further verified on
more realistic configurations in the future, such as the benchmark
coal flames in the Coal and Biomass Conversion (CBC) workshop.