Volume 4: Radiation Protection and Nuclear Technology Applications; Fuel Cycle, Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissionin 2014
DOI: 10.1115/icone22-30844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Two-Phase Boiling Flow and Critical Heat Flux

Abstract: This paper presents recent advances in the modeling of two-phase boiling flow and critical heat flux that have been implemented in the Extended Boiling Framework (EBF) [1, 2, 3]. The EBF code was developed as a customized module built on the foundation of the commercial Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code STAR-CD, which provides general two-phase flow modeling capabilities, for the detailed analysis of the two-phase flow and heat transfer phenomena that occur in Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) fuel assemblies.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NEK-2P two-fluid two-phase model development includes two sets of transport equations for mass, momentum, and energy for water and vapor phases. The full details of the transport equations and associated closures of Extended Boiling Framework (EBF) can be found in Tentner et al [5]. The NEK-2P two-fluid two-phase model validated for both critical heat flux and subcooled boiling flow benchmark tests [6].…”
Section: Two-fluid Two-phase Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The NEK-2P two-fluid two-phase model development includes two sets of transport equations for mass, momentum, and energy for water and vapor phases. The full details of the transport equations and associated closures of Extended Boiling Framework (EBF) can be found in Tentner et al [5]. The NEK-2P two-fluid two-phase model validated for both critical heat flux and subcooled boiling flow benchmark tests [6].…”
Section: Two-fluid Two-phase Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NEK-2P two-phase flow models utilize the Extended Boiling Framework [2] methodology previously developed at Argonne, which has been extended to include more fundamental physical models of boiling flow and heat transfer phenomena and advanced numerical algorithms for improved computational accuracy and computational speed. Previous work including the initial implementation of the Extended Boiling Framework in the CFD code STAR-CD showed promising potential for the fine-mesh, detailed simulation of fuel assembly two-phase flow phenomena [3,4,6], including the occurrence of Critical Heat Flux (CHF) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These heat flux components were specified per unit wall area and they decrease or become zero as the corresponding wallcontact area decreases. The wall heat flux is given by qw = qgas + qdrop + qliq + qvap + qqch + qdry (5) The heat flux components were calculated using the appropriate heat transfer coefficients and heat transfer area based on the local wall-cell topology:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When steam is used as the working fluid (CSP application) or as the reactant in high-temperature systems (STEP and SHTE applications), the understanding of the complex two-phase flow boiling process inside the absorber tubes of the direct steam generation receiver is important for identifying local hot spots, and designing and predicting receiver performance. The modeling approach for the coupled heat transfer and fluid flow problem in direct steam generation solar receivers can be inspired by the design of conventional steam generators or evaporators in coal-fired boiler power plants [19,20], pressurized water reactors (PWR) in nuclear power plants [21][22][23], and vapor-compression refrigeration system [24,25]. The development of a full 3D mechanistic model of the flow boiling process is challenging [26] due to the complex nature of the processes involved (activation of nucleation sites, bubble dynamics, and interfacial heat transfers) and the computational needs required for the solution of the direct numerical problem, which incorporates a large number of bubbles and surfaces with complex geometries [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%