2023
DOI: 10.3390/machines11070680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation and Optimization of Hydropneumatic Spring Damper Valves for Heavy Vehicle Applications

Abstract: To satisfy the design requirements for a hydropneumatic spring damper valve, the inlet–outlet pressure drop (ΔP) and the axial force on the spool (FZ) of a valve were investigated using fluid–solid coupling simulations and multi-objective optimization, along with the effects of the diameters of three internal holes (DA, DB, and DC) in the valve on the ΔP and the FZ. First, a meshed computational fluid dynamics model of a damper valve was established based on its geometric structure. Next, the effects of the fl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To conclude, the motion of the capsule usually has one direction of freedom along the pipeline axis. However, hydrodynamic force represents excitation with complex spatial-temporal characteristics; so, the response of the system is also a complex process [34]. In this work, we propose a dynamic model to resolve the complex spatial-temporal process of capsule motion, thus enabling a modal analysis of hydrodynamic force instead of direct time-averaged results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conclude, the motion of the capsule usually has one direction of freedom along the pipeline axis. However, hydrodynamic force represents excitation with complex spatial-temporal characteristics; so, the response of the system is also a complex process [34]. In this work, we propose a dynamic model to resolve the complex spatial-temporal process of capsule motion, thus enabling a modal analysis of hydrodynamic force instead of direct time-averaged results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%